首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of automated antral follicle counts made using three-dimensional ultrasound and SonoAVC.
【24h】

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of automated antral follicle counts made using three-dimensional ultrasound and SonoAVC.

机译:使用三维超声和SonoAVC进行的自动窦房卵计数的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of automated measurements of the total antral follicle count (AFC) made using Sono-Automatic Volume Count (SonoAVC), and to compare these to two-dimensional (2D) and manual three-dimensional (3D) techniques. METHODS: Fifty-five subjects aged under 40 years who had 3D transvaginal ultrasound examination in the early follicular phase of their menstrual cycle were prospectively recruited. 3D datasets were acquired and subsequently analyzed. The total AFC (2-10 mm antral follicles) was calculated by two observers using three independent methods: 2D real-time equivalent (2D-RTE), 3D manual multiplanar view (3D-MPV), and SonoAVC. For measurements made using SonoAVC, the initial automated count (sAVC-AA) was recorded and postprocessing (sAVC-PP) then applied to identify follicles that had been missed or incorrectly included. Intraclass correlation and limits of agreement were used to evaluate the methods. RESULTS: The intra- and interobserver reliability of measurements oftotal AFC was best with SonoAVC with postprocessing followed by 3D-MPV and 2D-RTE. The initial count calculated by sAVC-AA missed follicles and this was reflected in the significantly lower mean total AFC (6.51 +/- 4.79) than that made after postprocessing techniques (sAVC-PP, 18.42 +/- 10.53, P < 0.001; 3D-MPV, 19.38 +/- 10.85, P < 0.001; and 2D-RTE, 19.26 +/- 10.55, P < 0.001). The mean total AFC became more comparable with postprocessing (sAVC-PP) but still remained significantly lower than counts made with 2D-RTE and 3D-MPV (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SonoAVC with postprocessing is a reliable method for measuring total AFC. It takes longer to perform, because of the need for postprocessing, and obtains values that are lower than those obtained by the 2D and 3D-MPV techniques. However, the AFC obtained by sAVC-PP is likely to be lower because this method measures and color codes each follicle preventing recounting.
机译:目的:评估使用声纳自动容积计数(SonoAVC)进行的总肛门卵泡计数(AFC)自动测量的可靠性,并将其与二维(2D)和手动三维(3D)技术进行比较。方法:前瞻性招募了55名40岁以下的受试者,这些受试者在月经周期的早期卵泡期接受了3D经阴道超声检查。获取3D数据集,然后进行分析。两名观察者使用三种独立的方法计算了总AFC(2-10毫米的窦房滤泡):2D实时等效(2D-RTE),3D手动多平面视图(3D-MPV)和SonoAVC。对于使用SonoAVC进行的测量,记录了初始自动计数(sAVC-AA),然后应用后处理(sAVC-PP)来识别丢失或错误包含的卵泡。使用类内相关性和一致性限制来评估方法。结果:使用SonoAVC进行后处理,然后进行3D-MPV和2D-RTE,对AFC的总测量在观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性最高。 sAVC-AA计算的初始卵泡漏失计数,反映在平均总AFC(6.51 +/- 4.79)明显低于后处理技术(sAVC-PP,18.42 +/- 10.53,P <0.001; 3D -MPV,19.38 +/- 10.85,P <0.001;和2D-RTE,19.26 +/- 10.55,P <0.001)。平均总AFC与后处理(sAVC-PP)更具可比性,但仍显着低于2D-RTE和3D-MPV的计数(P <0.05)。结论:带后处理的SonoAVC是一种测量总AFC的可靠方法。由于需要后处理,因此执行时间更长,并且获得的值比2D和3D-MPV技术获得的值要低。但是,通过sAVC-PP获得的AFC可能会更低,因为此方法会测量每个卵泡并用颜色编码来防止计数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号