首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology >Measurement of pulse wave velocity using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound: comparison with arterial tonometry.
【24h】

Measurement of pulse wave velocity using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound: comparison with arterial tonometry.

机译:使用脉搏波多普勒超声测量脉搏波速度:与动脉眼压计比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pulse wave velocity (PWV), the speed of propagation of arterial pressure waves through the arterial tree, is related to arterial stiffness and is an important prognostic marker for cardiovascular events. In clinical practice PWV is commonly determined by arterial tonometry, with a noninvasive pressure sensor applied sequentially over carotid and femoral arteries. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is used as a timing reference to determine the time delay or "transit time" between the upstroke of carotid and femoral pulse waveforms. Commercially available vascular ultrasound scanners provide a pulsed wave (PW) Doppler velocity signal, which should allow determination of carotid-femoral transit time and hence PWV. We compared carotid-femoral PWV measured by tonometry and by PW Doppler ultrasound (Seimens, Apsen scanner with 7 MHz linear transducer) in asymptomatic subjects (n = 62, 26 male, aged 21 to 72 y). To test for intra-subject and inter-observer variation, ten subjects were scanned by one observer on twooccasions 2 wk apart and by two observers on same day. PWV by tonometry ranged from 5.3 to 15.0 m/s. There was no significant difference between mean values of PWV obtained by the two techniques (mean difference: 0.3 m/s, standard deviation of difference: 1.5 m/s), which were closely correlated (r = 0.83). The coefficient of variation for repeated measures on the same subject by the same observer was 10.1% and the inter-observer coefficient of variation was 5.8%. These results suggest a commercial ultrasound scanner can be used to measure PWV, giving results that are reproducible and closely correlated with those obtained by arterial tonometry. (E-mail: ben_yu.jiang@kcl.ac.uk).
机译:脉搏波速度(PWV),即动脉压力波通过动脉树的传播速度,与动脉僵硬度有关,是心血管事件的重要预后指标。在临床实践中,PWV通常通过动脉眼压测定法确定,并在颈动脉和股动脉上依次应用无创压力传感器。心电图(ECG)用作定时参考,以确定在颈动脉和股脉波形的上冲之间的时间延迟或“转换时间”。市售的血管超声扫描仪可提供脉冲波(PW)多普勒速度信号,该信号应允许确定颈股动时间和PWV。我们比较了无症状受试者(n = 62、26男性,年龄21至72岁)通过眼压测量法和PW多普勒超声(Seimens,具有7 MHz线性换能器的Apsen扫描仪)测量的颈股PWV。为了测试受试者内部和观察者之间的差异,一名观察员在间隔2周的两个场合扫描了十名受试者,同一天又由两名观察员扫描了十名受试者。眼压计的PWV为5.3至15.0 m / s。两种技术获得的PWV平均值之间无显着差异(均值差:0.3 m / s,差值的标准偏差:1.5 m / s),它们之间密切相关(r = 0.83)。同一观察者对同一受试者重复测量的变异系数为10.1%,观察者之间的变异系数为5.8%。这些结果表明,可以使用商用超声扫描仪测量PWV,从而得出可重复的结果,并与通过动脉眼压测量获得的结果密切相关。 (电子邮件:ben_yu.jiang@kcl.ac.uk)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号