...
首页> 外文期刊>Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer >Preferences for and experiences of family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: Patient-caregiver dyads study
【24h】

Preferences for and experiences of family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: Patient-caregiver dyads study

机译:家庭参与癌症治疗决策的偏爱和经历:患者护理双联研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Despite the important role that family caregivers play in providing emotional and practical support to cancer patients, relatively little is known about the family caregiver's role in treatment decision-making (TDM). We sought to investigate patients' and family caregivers' preferences for and experiences of family involvement in TDM and factors associated with preference concordance. Method: A national survey was performed with 990 patient-caregiver dyads (participation rate:76.2%). Questions examining preferences for and experiences of family involvement in TDM were administered independently to patients and family caregivers. Concordance was calculated with weighted kappa. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of patients' and caregivers' preferences for family involvement in TDM and concordance between them. Results: Few patients or family caregivers expressed a preference for unilateral decision-making; however, there was considerable variation and poor agreement within dyads in regard to whether the patient or family caregivers should take the lead in decision-making with input from the other (weighted kappa between respondents for TDM preferences and experiences = 0.10 and κ = 0.18, respectively). Greater TDM preference concordance was associated with higher patient education, whereas lower levels of concordance were evident for younger patients, less educated caregivers, adult child patient dyads (as opposed to a spouse-patient dyads) and problematic family communication about cancer. Conclusions: Most patients and family caregivers valued and expected family involvement in TDM. However, there is little explicit agreement in regard to which party in the dyad should take decisional leadership and who should play a supporting role.
机译:背景:尽管家庭护理人员在为癌症患者提供情感和实践支持方面发挥着重要作用,但对于家庭护理人员在治疗决策中的作用知之甚少。我们试图调查患者和家庭护理人员对TDM的偏爱和家庭参与的经验以及与偏爱一致性相关的因素。方法:一项全国性调查对990名患者/护理人员进行了调查(参与率:76.2%)。对患者和家庭护理人员独立进行了检查,以了解他们对TDM的偏好和家庭参与的问题。用加权κ计算一致性。逻辑回归分析用于确定患者和看护人对家庭参与TDM的偏好及其之间的一致性的预测因素。结果:很少有患者或家庭护理人员表示愿意单方面决策;但是,在患者和家庭护理人员应由其他人提供意见的情况下领导决策方面,各部门之间存在相当大的差异,并且协议不一致(TDM偏好和经验的受访者之间的加权kappa = 0.10和κ= 0.18,分别)。较高的TDM偏好一致性与较高的患者教育水平相关,而较低的一致性水平在年轻患者,教育程度较低的看护人,成年儿童患者二元组(而不是配偶-患者二元组)和有关癌症的家庭沟通问题上很明显。结论:大多数患者和家庭护理人员都重视和期望家庭参与TDM。但是,关于二元组中的哪一方应担任决定性领导以及谁应起支持作用,尚无明确的协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号