首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and aging >Hour Glass Half Full or Half Empty? Future Time Perspective and Preoccupation With Negative Events Across the Life Span
【24h】

Hour Glass Half Full or Half Empty? Future Time Perspective and Preoccupation With Negative Events Across the Life Span

机译:沙漏半满还是半空?未来时间观点和对整个生命周期内负面事件的关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

According to socioemotional selectivity theory, older adults' emotional well-being stems from having a limited future time perspective that motivates them to maximize well-being in the "here and now." Presumably, then, older adults' time horizons are associated with emotional competencies that boost positive affect and dampen negative affect, but little research has addressed this. Using a U.S. adult life-span sample (N = 3,933; 18-93 years), we found that a 2-factor model of future time perspective (future opportunities; limited time) fit the data better than a 1-factor model. Through middle age, people perceived the life-span hourglass as half full-they focused more on future opportunities than limited time. Around Age 60, the balance changed to increasingly perceiving the life-span hourglass as half empty-they focused less on future opportunities and more on limited time, even after accounting for perceived health, self-reported decision-making ability, and retirement status. At all ages, women's time horizons focused more on future opportunities compared with men's, and men's focused more on limited time. Focusing on future opportunities was associated with reporting less preoccupation with negative events, whereas focusing on limited time was associated with reporting more preoccupation. Older adults reported less preoccupation with negative events, and this association was stronger after controlling for their perceptions of limited time and fewer future opportunities, suggesting that other pathways may explain older adults' reports of their ability to disengage from negative events. Insights gained and questions raised by measuring future time perspective as 2 dimensions are discussed.
机译:根据社会情感选择性理论,老年人的情感幸福感源于对未来时间的局限性,从而激发了他们在“此时此刻”实现最大幸福感的动机。大概,老年人的时间跨度与情感能力有关,这些情感能力会增强积极影响而减弱消极影响,但很少有研究针对此。使用美国成人寿命样本(N = 3,933; 18-93岁),我们发现未来时间观点的2因子模型(未来机会;有限的时间)比1因子模型更适合数据。到了中年,人们一直认为沙漏的寿命是一半,他们更多地关注未来的机会,而不是有限的时间。大约在60岁左右,平衡变成了越来越多地意识到寿命的沙漏,因为一半的时间都空了,即使考虑到健康状况,自我报告的决策能力和退休状态,他们也将注意力集中在未来的机会上,而更多地关注有限的时间。在所有年龄段,与男性相比,女性的时间范围都将更多的精力放在未来的机会上,而男性则将精力更多地放在有限的时间上。关注未来的机会与报告负面事件的关注度降低相关,而关注有限的时间与报告更多的关注度相关。老年人报告对消极事件的关注较少,并且在控制了他们对有限时间和未来机会的感知后,这种关联性增强了,这表明其他途径可能解释了老年人摆脱消极事件的能力的报告。讨论了通过测量未来时间角度(二维)获得的见解和提出的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号