首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and aging >Who saves the best for last? Age differences in preferences for affective sequences
【24h】

Who saves the best for last? Age differences in preferences for affective sequences

机译:谁把最好的留到最后?情感序列偏好的年龄差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We examined age differences in preferences for the temporal sequence of emotional events. In 2 studies, participants were asked to select the order in which they would like to view a series of emotionally salient images. Study 1 (N = 87; aged 21-88 years) elicited sequence preferences both directly (via a sequence construction task) and indirectly (via a temporal discounting task). Study 2 (N = 90; aged 21-89 years) used a modified version of the sequence construction task in which the sequence was selected prospectively instead of concurrently. Across both studies, younger participants preferred increasingly positive sequences, but this preference was negatively associated with age. Future time perspective was associated with both age and sequence preferences. In contrast, age differences in sequence preferences were not explained by personality traits, affective responses, or age-related decrements in cognitive functioning.
机译:我们研究了情绪事件在时间序列上的年龄差异。在2项研究中,要求参与者选择他们想要查看一系列情感显着图像的顺序。研究1(N = 87;年龄在21-88岁)直接(通过序列构建任务)和间接(通过时间折现任务)引起序列偏好。研究2(N = 90;年龄在21-89岁)使用了序列构建任务的修改版本,在该版本中,前瞻性而非同时选择了序列。在这两项研究中,年轻的参与者都倾向于越来越积极的序列,但是这种偏好与年龄呈负相关。未来时间的观点与年龄和序列偏好有关。相反,序列偏好的年龄差异不能用人格特质,情感反应或与年龄相关的认知功能下降来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号