...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry research >Deconstructing theory of mind in schizophrenia
【24h】

Deconstructing theory of mind in schizophrenia

机译:解构精神分裂症的心理理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

First- and second-order theory of mind (ToM) abilities seem to form a hierarchy of mind states within the same construct. If so, no ability in higher comprehension of intentionality would be possible when the previous one is failing. The purpose of the study is to investigate this hierarchy in a sample of schizophrenic subjects. Insofar as ToM defines processes involved in a multi-level social cognitive processing, they could be part of a scenario of specialized areas performing different parallel computations. Therefore, we further investigated the relationship of ToM scores to metacognitive indexes, widely demonstrated to be involved in social cognition, symptomatology and global functionality, in two independent samples of subjects with schizophrenia.Thirty-eight subjects with schizophrenia were preliminarily examined for first- and second-order ToM, using only one story in each order. Cross-tabulation of subjects according to their answers revealed that 13.2% of subjects gave incorrect answers to ToM I but correct answers to ToM II. A more extensive examination of first- and second-order ToM in a sample of 42 subjects with schizophrenia was then performed. The results confirmed the existence of a group of subjects (11.9%) scoring incorrectly at ToM I but correctly at ToM II, which is unexplainable if the hierarchical hypothesis were true. While both ToM scores were highly correlated with metacognitive scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), for both positive and negative clusters, and only second-order ToM was correlated with scores on the Global Assessment of Function (GAF). On the other hand, meta-cognitive indexes were correlated with both PANSS and GAF scores. First-order ToM was found to play an essential role in determining clinical severity. ToM I and II order scores share a minor part of variance.Instead of hierarchically ordered mind states, first- and second-order intentionality can represent different constructs. The ability to 'understand others', i.e. ToM, can be dissociable, suggesting the existence of an interconnected network of different constructs deputed to an adequate understanding and management of the social world complexity.
机译:一阶和二阶心理理论(ToM)能力似乎在同一结构中形成了心理状态的层次结构。如果是这样,那么当前一个失败时,就不可能具有更高的意向性理解能力。该研究的目的是研究精神分裂症患者样本中的这种等级。就ToM定义涉及多层次社会认知处理的过程而言,它们可能是专门区域执行不同并行计算的场景的一部分。因此,我们在两个独立的精神分裂症患者样本中进一步调查了ToM评分与元认知指标的关系,该认知被广泛证明与社会认知,症状学和整体功能有关.38位精神分裂症患者被初步检查为第一和第二位。二阶ToM,每个阶仅使用一个故事。根据受试者的答案进行交叉列表显示,有13.2%的受试者对ToM I给出了错误答案,但对ToM II给出了正确答案。然后对42位精神分裂症患者的样本中的一阶和二阶ToM进行了更广泛的检查。结果证实存在一组受试者(11.9%)在ToM I得分不正确,但在ToM II得分正确,如果层次假设是正确的,则无法解释。尽管两个ToM得分都与阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)上的元认知得分高度相关,但对于阳性和阴性组,只有二阶ToM与全局功能评估(GAF)上的得分相关。另一方面,元认知指数与PANSS和GAF得分均相关。发现一阶ToM在确定临床严重性方面起着至关重要的作用。一阶和二阶TOM分数差异较小。一阶和二阶意向性可以表示不同的结构,而不是层次结构的思维状态。 “理解他人”(即ToM)的能力可能是分离的,这表明存在不同结构的互连网络,这些网络被认为可以充分理解和管理社会世界的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号