首页> 外文期刊>Quintessence international >Differences in reported medical conditions between myogenous and arthrogenous TMD patients and its relevance to the general practitioner.
【24h】

Differences in reported medical conditions between myogenous and arthrogenous TMD patients and its relevance to the general practitioner.

机译:肌肉型和关节型TMD患者报告的医疗状况之间的差异及其与全科医生的相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare self-reported medical conditions between a group of myogenous and arthrogenous temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients and highlight its relevance to the general practitioner.The patient population consisted of 274 consecutive patients (14.6% male, 85.4% female; mean age 39.6 ± 14.2 years) diagnosed with either myogenous or arthrogenous TMD according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. Self-reported medical conditions were derived from a standardized medical health questionnaire that patients completed during their initial examination. Data were compared between the two groups by means of chi-square tests, t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. The level of significance was set at α = .05.Patients with myogenous TMD reported a greater number of medical conditions compared to arthrogenous TMD patients from the following broad categories: neurologic, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, psychologic, and "other". The following nine specific conditions were reported significantly more often in the myogenous group: severe headaches, fainting/dizzy spells, gastric acid reflux, fibromyalgia, anxiety, depression, psychiatric treatment, phobias, and frequent sore throats. The myogenous group reported pain to be significantly more severe than the arthrogenous group. Pain duration did not differ between the two groups.Patients with myogenous TMD self-reported significantly more comorbid disorders and more severe pain than patients with arthrogenous TMD. Understanding the differences between these two groups of patients will allow for more appropriate and targeted care for these populations. Future studies may focus on determining subgroups that are more likely to be indicative of a larger widespread pain syndrome to help guide individualized management strategies.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较一组肌源性和关节炎性颞下颌关节疾病(TMD)患者之间的自我报告的医疗状况,并强调其与全科医生的相关性。患者人群包括274名连续患者(男性14.6%,男性85.4%)女性;平均年龄39.6±14.2岁),已根据《颞下颌疾病研究诊断标准》诊断为肌源性或关节源性TMD。自我报告的医疗状况来自患者最初检查时完成的标准化医疗健康调查表。通过卡方检验,t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组之间的数据。显着性水平定为α= .05。与来自以下广泛类别的关节炎TMD患者相比,患有肌源性TMD的患者报告的医疗状况更多:神经系统,胃肠道,肌肉骨骼,心理和“其他”类别。在肌源性组中,以下九种特定疾病的发生率明显更高:严重头痛,晕厥/头晕,胃酸反流,纤维肌痛,焦虑,抑郁,精神病治疗,恐惧症和频发的咽喉痛。肌源性组报告的疼痛比关节源性组严重得多。两组患者的疼痛持续时间无差异。患有自发性TMD的患者比自发性TMD的患者自我报告的合并症和痛苦更严重。了解这两组患者之间的差异将为这些人群提供更合适和更有针对性的护理。未来的研究可能集中在确定更可能指示更大的广泛性疼痛综合征的亚组,以帮助指导个体化的治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号