...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology >Dropout in secondary education: an application of a multilevel discrete-time hazard model accounting for school changes
【24h】

Dropout in secondary education: an application of a multilevel discrete-time hazard model accounting for school changes

机译:中等教育辍学:考虑学校变化的多级离散时间危害模型的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

For several decades, researchers have focused on dropout in search for an explanation and prevention of this phenomenon. However, past research is characterized by methodological shortcomings. Most of this research was conducted without considering the hierarchical structure of educational data and ignored the longitudinal path towards dropout. Moreover, research that did take into account these shortcomings, did not correct for student mobility between schools, despite the strong correlation with dropout (South et al. 2007). In this study, we attempt to address these shortcoming by implementing a multilevel discrete-time hazard model and exploring the effect of different school classifications on the school effects. Partially analogous to Grady and Beretvas (2010) we compare models with estimated school effects based on the first and on the last school attended and compare these models with multiple membership models and cross-classified models. The results of this comparison indicate that ignoring student mobility can have strong implications on the predictors of dropout. Not only do models which take into account this mobility yield better model fits, models ignoring this mobility tend to miss the effect of school level variables. With respect to the conclusions on dropout research, our models provide evidence for the often cited student characteristics predicting dropout and indicate stronger school effects than generally assumed.
机译:几十年来,研究人员一直致力于辍学,以寻求对这种现象的解释和预防。但是,以往的研究存在方法学缺陷。大多数研究是在没有考虑教育数据的层次结构的情况下进行的,并且忽略了辍学的纵向路径。此外,尽管考虑到了这些缺点,但尽管与辍学率有很强的相关性,但研究并未纠正学生在学校之间的流动性(South et al。2007)。在本研究中,我们尝试通过实施多级离散时间危害模型并探索不同学校类别对学校效果的影响来解决这些缺陷。与Grady和Beretvas(2010)的研究部分相似,我们将模型与预估的学校效果进行了比较,该效果基于第一所就读学校和最后一所就读学校而进行了比较,并将这些模型与多个成员模型和交叉分类模型进行了比较。比较结果表明,忽略学生的流动性可能会对辍学的预测因素产生重大影响。不仅考虑了这种流动性的模型能够产生更好的模型拟合,而且忽略这种流动性的模型往往会错过学校水平变量的影响。关于辍学研究的结论,我们的模型为经常被引用的预测辍学的学生特征提供了证据,并表明其对学校的影响要强于普遍的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号