...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology >Artificial neural networks and fuzzy time series forecasting: an application to air quality
【24h】

Artificial neural networks and fuzzy time series forecasting: an application to air quality

机译:人工神经网络和模糊时间序列预测:在空气质量中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The arising air pollution has addressed much attention globally due to its detrimental effects on human health and environment. As an early warning system for air quality control and management, it is important to provide precise information about the future concentrations in pollutants. We present here a time series model in predicting the Air Pollution Index (API) from three different stations; industrial, residential, and sub-urban areas between 2000 and 2009. In this paper, the Box-Jenkins approach of seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural network (ANN), and three models of fuzzy time series (FTS) have been compared by using the mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute error, mean square error, and root mean square error. Although all the methods were used as operational tools, the ANN seemed more accurate in forecasting API. The results showed that FTS (i.e. Chen's, Yu's, and Cheng's) performed inconsistent results since the conventional methods of ARIMA outperformed the performance of FTS. However, consistent results were achieved as the ANNs gave the smallest forecasting error compared to FTS and ARIMA.
机译:由于其对人类健康和环境的有害影响,由此产生的空气污染已引起全球的广泛关注。作为空气质量控制和管理的预警系统,提供有关未来污染物浓度的精确信息非常重要。我们在这里介绍一个时间序列模型,用于预测来自三个不同站点的空气污染指数(API); 2000年至2009年之间的工业,住宅和郊区地区。本文采用Box-Jenkins方法进行季节自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA),人工神经网络(ANN)和三个模糊时间序列(FTS)模型通过使用平均绝对百分比误差,平均绝对误差,均方误差和均方根误差进行比较。尽管所有方法都用作操作工具,但是ANN在预测API方面似乎更为准确。结果表明,由于ARIMA的常规方法优于FTS的性能,FTS(即Chen's,Yu's和Cheng's)的结果不一致。但是,与FTS和ARIMA相比,由于ANN给出的预测误差最小,因此获得了一致的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号