...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >Cluster analysis: a useful technique to identify elderly cardiac patients at risk for poor quality of life.
【24h】

Cluster analysis: a useful technique to identify elderly cardiac patients at risk for poor quality of life.

机译:聚类分析:一种有用的技术,用于识别有生命质量低下风险的老年心脏病患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study are (1) to examine the frequency of cardiac symptoms in elderly people one year after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and/or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG); (2) to identify patient subgroups (cluster solutions) based on cardiac symptoms after cardiac events and (3) to determine if these subgroups vary based on health related quality of life and psychological distress. METHODS: A sample of 206 elderly, unpartnered, patients (age > or = 65) were interviewed one year after AMI and/or CABG by telephone. Cardiac symptoms, SF-36, POMS, and QOL-I were measured. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify patient subgroups based on cardiac symptoms, using a combination of dendrograms and stopping rules. RESULTS: Three subgroups were identified: (1) the Weary (19.4%), (2) the Diffuse symptom (68.4%), and (3) the Breathless groups (12.2%). The Weary group had significantly lower scores on all of SF-36 subscales (except for social functioning) and higher scores on all of POMS subscales (except for Anger/hostility and Confusion/Bewilderment) compared to the Diffuse symptom group. CONCLUSIONS: The cluster analysis was useful to identify the subgroup with poorer recovery. Patients in the Weary group need more attention and intervention strategies to improve their health.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是(1)检查急性心肌梗塞(AMI)和/或冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)一年后老年人心脏症状的发生率; (2)根据心脏事件后的心脏症状识别患者亚组(集群解决方案),以及(3)根据健康相关的生活质量和心理困扰确定这些亚组是否有所不同。方法:在AMI和/或CABG一年后,通过电话采访了206名年龄较大或年龄≥65岁的无伴侣老年患者。测量心脏症状,SF-36,POMS和QOL-1。使用树状图和停止规则的组合,使用分层聚类分析基于心脏症状来识别患者亚组。结果:确定了三个亚组:(1)疲倦(19.4%),(2)弥漫性症状(68.4%)和(3)无呼吸的组(12.2%)。与弥散症状组相比,疲倦组在所有SF-36分量表(社交功能除外)上的得分均显着较低,而在所有POMS分量表(愤怒/敌对情绪和困惑/困惑)上的得分均较高。结论:聚类分析可用于识别恢复较差的亚组。疲倦组中的患者需要更多关注和干预策略以改善健康状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号