首页> 外文期刊>Publishing research quarterly >Disciplinary Duality: The Contested Terrain of Book Studies
【24h】

Disciplinary Duality: The Contested Terrain of Book Studies

机译:学科二重性:书籍研究的争议领域

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Book Studies is an emerging field, which encompasses Book History and Book Arts. Because of this duality it is not always clear whether it is a free-standing discipline or merely an interdisciplinary academic program. This article attempts to investigates its disciplinary identity through an in-depth analysis of Book Studies' history, discursive field, major stakeholders, and scholarly communications. In addition, the article identifies and explores a few major academic programs in Book Studies in the United States and abroad. Based on the evidence gathered from the syllabi of the academic programs and the scholarly communication of the participants, some of the implications of the article are: the discursive field of Book Studies is developing around two very different centers, Book History and Book Arts; Book Studies’ acquired dual disciplinary identity is not a “birth defect” but rather a goal of including sociocultural, historic and aesthetic aspects of the book. The potential future of Book Studies as a field is also discussed.
机译:抽象书籍研究是一个新兴领域,涵盖了书籍历史和书籍艺术。由于这种二重性,它是一门独立的学科还是一门跨学科的学术课程并不总是很清楚。本文试图通过对书籍研究的历史,话语领域,主要利益相关者以及学术交流的深入分析来研究其学科身份。此外,本文还确定并探索了美国和国外有关图书研究的一些主要学术课程。根据从学术课程大纲和参与者的学术交流中收集的证据,本文的一些含义是:书籍研究的话语领域围绕着两个非常不同的中心-书籍历史和书籍艺术-发展;图书研究的双重学科特征不是“出生缺陷”,而是旨在纳入图书的社会文化,历史和美学方面的目标。还讨论了书籍研究作为一个领域的潜在未来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号