首页> 外文期刊>Quality management in health care >A 2-tier study of direct care providers assessing the effectiveness of the red rule education project and precipitating factors surrounding red rule violations.
【24h】

A 2-tier study of direct care providers assessing the effectiveness of the red rule education project and precipitating factors surrounding red rule violations.

机译:对直接护理提供者的2层研究,评估了红规教育项目的有效性,并明确了违反红规的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a safety initiative, Inova Loudoun Hospital implemented a Red Rule policy and educated 100% of its staff. The policy consisted of 2 Red Rules: critical requirements for safety associated with an activity or a procedure. The purpose of tier 1 of this 2-tier survey research project was to determine the effectiveness of the educational effort in 13 departments of the hospital. Of the 128 participants, 61% provided a correct or partially correct definition for Red Rule 1 and 12% for Red Rule 2. From an evidence-based practice viewpoint, study results concluded that the Red Rule Education Project required reinforcement. The purpose of tier 2 was to quantify factors that contributed to safety events in the departments of the hospital. Employees violating a Red Rule were asked to complete a survey identifying the factors influencing their behavior. Of the 13 participants (RNs = 100%), the order of frequency of factors influencing errors was interruptions (77%), rushing (69%), inadequate staffing (39%), fatigue (31%), and poor communication (38%). Respondents did not report an awareness of committing an error during the time of the error occurrence. Awareness of specific factors contributing to an error can facilitate process improvement and future counseling and educational efforts.
机译:作为一项安全举措,伊诺瓦劳登医院实施了“红色规则”政策,并对其100%的员工进行了教育。该政策由2条红色规则组成:与活动或程序相关的安全关键要求。这个2层调查研究项目的1层的目的是确定医院13个科室中教育工作的有效性。在128名参与者中,有61%为红色规则1提供了正确或部分正确的定义,为红色规则2提供了12%的定义。从基于证据的实践角度来看,研究结果得出结论,红色规则教育项目需要加强。第2层的目的是量化导致医院各部门发生安全事件的因素。要求违反红色规则的员工完成一项调查,以确定影响其行为的因素。在13名参与者中(RNs = 100%),影响错误的因素的频率顺序是中断(77%),匆忙(69%),人员不足(39%),疲劳(31%)和沟通不良(38) %)。在错误发生期间,受访者没有报告过犯错误的意识。意识到导致错误的特定因素可以促进流程改进以及将来的咨询和教育工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号