...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychopharmacology >Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis.

机译:延迟奖励折扣和成瘾行为:荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

RATIONALE: Delayed reward discounting (DRD) is a behavioral economic index of impulsivity and numerous studies have examined DRD in relation to addictive behavior. To synthesize the findings across the literature, the current review is a meta-analysis of studies comparing DRD between criterion groups exhibiting addictive behavior and control groups. OBJECTIVES: The meta-analysis sought to characterize the overall patterns of findings, systematic variability by sample and study type, and possible small study (publication) bias. METHODS: Literature reviews identified 310 candidate articles from which 46 studies reporting 64 comparisons were identified (total N=56,013). RESULTS: From the total comparisons identified, a small magnitude effect was evident (d= .15; p< .00001) with very high heterogeneity of effect size. Based on systematic observed differences, large studies assessing DRD with a small number of self-report items were removed and an analysis of 57 comparisons (n=3,329) using equivalent methods and exhibiting acceptable heterogeneity revealed a medium magnitude effect (d= .58; p< .00001). Further analyses revealed significantly larger effect sizes for studies using clinical samples (d= .61) compared with studies using nonclinical samples (d=.45). Indices of small study bias among the various comparisons suggested varying levels of influence by unpublished findings, ranging from minimal to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide strong evidence of greater DRD in individuals exhibiting addictive behavior in general and particularly in individuals who meet criteria for an addictive disorder. Implications for the assessment of DRD and research priorities are discussed.
机译:理由:延迟奖励折扣(DRD)是一种冲动的行为经济指标,许多研究已经研究了与成瘾行为有关的DRD。为了综合文献中的发现,本篇综述是一项研究的荟萃分析,该研究比较了表现成瘾行为的标准组和对照组之间的DRD。目的:荟萃分析旨在表征研究结果的总体模式,样本和研究类型的系统变异性以及可能存在的较小研究(出版)偏倚。方法:文献综述鉴定出310篇候选文章,从中鉴定出46篇报告64项比较的研究(总N = 56,013)。结果:从确定的总比较中,明显的小幅度效应(d = .15; p <.00001)与效应大小的高度异质性。根据系统观察到的差异,删除了评估DRD并包含少量自我报告项目的大型研究,并使用等效方法对57个比较(n = 3,329)进行了分析并显示出可接受的异质性,显示出中等程度的影响(d = .58; p <.00001)。进一步的分析显示,与使用非临床样品的研究(d = .45)相比,使用临床样品的研究(d = .61)具有更大的效应量。各种比较中研究偏倚较小的指标表明,未发表的发现对研究的影响程度不同,范围从最小到中等。结论:这些结果提供了强有力的证据,证明一般表现出成瘾行为的个体,特别是在符合成瘾性疾病标准的个体中,DRD更高。讨论了对DRD评估和研究重点的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号