首页> 外文期刊>Psychophysiology >Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography
【24h】

Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography

机译:四分之三的电极带配置与全阻抗带配置用于阻抗心动图的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Impedance cardiography is a technique commonly used in psychophysiological studies. However, concerns about the utility of full circumferential band electrodes (FB) have been raised. The current study was designed to compare FB with a three-quarter circumferential band configuration (PB). A total of 47 participants (66% female, mean [SD] age=20.4 [3.0] years) underwent 2 testing sessions, once using FB and once using PB. Session order was randomized and balanced. Each session consisted of 5 min of rest, math task, recovery, and cold pressor test. Average baseline and task pre-ejection period (PEP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) was calculated from impedance cardiography and blood pressure monitoring. Participants were are asked to rate measures of comfort after each session. There were no significant difference between the mean levels of PEP, SV, CO, HR, and TPR for the PB versus the FB configurations. However, both systolic BP and diastolic BP were higher during the FB session. Intraclass correlations were high (r(icc)=.63-.93) between PB and FB. Bland-Altman analyses revealed a low level of bias (< 5%) between the configurations. Based on limits of agreement between +/- 30%, there was equivalence in PEP between the 2 configurations, and SV, CO, and TPR were close to reaching equivalence. Participants clearly indicated greater comfort with the PB configuration compared to the FB. The current study provides incremental evidence that suggests a three-quarter PB configuration may be utilized for standard psychophysiological testing instead of the standard FB configuration. However, further studies are needed to validate the PB configuration against other techniques.
机译:阻抗心动图是一种在心理生理研究中常用的技术。但是,引起了对全周向带状电极(FB)的实用性的关注。当前的研究旨在比较FB与四分之三的圆周带配置(PB)。总共47位参与者(女性66%,平均[SD]年龄= 20.4 [3.0]岁)接受了2次测试,一次使用FB,一次使用PB。会议顺序是随机的和平衡的。每节课包括5分钟的休息,数学任务,恢复和冷压测试。从阻抗心动图和血液中计算出平均基线和任务预射血期(PEP),中风量(SV),心输出量(CO),心率(HR),血压(BP)和总外周阻力(TPR)压力监测。要求参与者在每次训练后对舒适度进行评分。 PB和FB配置的PEP,SV,CO,HR和TPR的平均水平之间没有显着差异。但是,在FB期间收缩压和舒张压都较高。 PB和FB之间的类内相关性很高(r(icc)=。63-.93)。 Bland-Altman分析显示,配置之间的偏差程度较低(<5%)。根据+/- 30%之间的一致性限制,两种配置之间的PEP相等,并且SV,CO和TPR接近相等。与FB相比,参与者清楚地表明PB配置的舒适性更高。当前的研究提供了增量证据,表明四分之三的PB配置可用于标准的心理生理测试,而不是标准的FB配置。但是,还需要进一步研究以针对其他技术验证PB配置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号