首页> 外文期刊>Psychopharmacology >Buspirone and lorazepam in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in outpatients.
【24h】

Buspirone and lorazepam in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in outpatients.

机译:丁螺环酮和劳拉西m在门诊患者中治疗广泛性焦虑症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled 10-week trial, the anxiolytic properties of the nonbenzodiazepine buspirone were compared with the benzodiazepine lorazepam and placebo in 125 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder according to DSM-III. After a 3- to 7-day wash-out period, patients were allocated at random to receive orally 3 x 5 mg buspirone (n=58), 3 x 1 mg lorazepam (n=57), or placebo (n=10) over a 4-week period. The study also comprised a 2-week taper period and a 4-week placebo-control period to assess the stability of clinical improvement. The patient's clinical state was estimated on entry and at weekly intervals by general practitioners using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) assessment and by a self-rating scale (State Trait Anxiety Inventory X2=STAI-X2). Lorazepam treatment resulted in descriptively, but not significantly, greater improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety during the whole treatment (week 0-4) and taper period (week 5, 6) than did buspirone. After treatment with active drugs had been discontinued, the 4-week placebo control period showed buspirone-treated patients to display a stability of clinical improvement, while the symptoms of lorazepam-treated patients worsened at week 7-10. Both buspirone and lorazepam were more efficacious in reducing anxiety symptoms than placebo during the treatment and taper period; however, in contrast to the active drugs (buspirone, lorazepam), patients of the placebo group showed further clinical improvement during the control period, especially in the HAM-A score, so differences between placebo and active drugs became smaller at the end of the study.
机译:在这项双盲,安慰剂对照的10周试验中,根据DSM-III,对125名患有广泛性焦虑症的门诊患者,比较了非苯并二氮杂bus螺环酮与苯并二氮杂苦raz碱和安慰剂的抗焦虑特性。经过3至7天的冲洗期后,随机分配患者口服3 x 5 mg丁螺环酮(n = 58),3 x 1 mg劳拉西m(n = 57)或安慰剂(n = 10)在4周的时间内。该研究还包括2周的锥度期和4周的安慰剂对照期,以评估临床改善的稳定性。全科医生使用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)和临床总体印象(CGI)评估以及自评量表(状态特征焦虑量表X2 = STAI)在入院时和每周间隔对患者的临床状态进行评估-X2)。劳拉西m治疗在整体治疗(0-4周)和减量期(第5、6周)的治疗中,在描述性但非显着性方面,使汉密尔顿焦虑量表的改善比丁螺环酮更大。在停止使用活性药物治疗后,为期4周的安慰剂控制期显示,使用丁螺环酮治疗的患者表现出稳定的临床改善,而接受劳拉西m治疗的患者的症状在7-10周时恶化。在治疗和减量期,丁螺环酮和劳拉西m均比安慰剂更有效地减轻焦虑症状。但是,与活性药物(丁螺环酮,劳拉西m)相比,安慰剂组的患者在对照期内表现出进一步的临床改善,尤其是HAM-A评分,因此安慰剂组与活性药物之间的差异在治疗结束时变小了。研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号