...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >Ratings of ADHD Symptoms and Academic Impairment by Mothers, Fathers, Teachers, and Aides: Construct Validity Within and Across Settings as Well as Occasions
【24h】

Ratings of ADHD Symptoms and Academic Impairment by Mothers, Fathers, Teachers, and Aides: Construct Validity Within and Across Settings as Well as Occasions

机译:母亲,父亲,教师和助手的注意力缺陷多动障碍症状和学业障碍的等级评定:在各种场合和场合中建立有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A Multiple Indicator x Multiple Trait x Multiple Source x Multiple Occasion design was used to evaluate invariance, convergent and discriminant validity of ADHD-inattention (IN), ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and academic impairment scores from the Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory (CADBI) using confirmatory factor analysis. Mothers, fathers, teachers, and aides completed the CADBI on 811 Spanish 1st-grade children (54% boys) twice (6-week separation). For mothers and fathers, like loadings, thresholds/intercepts, factor means, factor variances, and factor covariances/correlations were invariant across sources and occasions. All 3 factors also showed convergent (convergent correlations from .69 to .83) and significant discriminant validity. For teachers and aides, there was also invariance of parameters along with convergent and discriminant validity over sources and occasions (convergent correlations from .67 to .87). With construct validity established for home and school, it was meaningful to test construct validity between home and school. Like-item loadings and thresholds/intercepts were invariant between home and school, with the ADHD-HI factor mean being lower at school. Convergent validity of ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and academic impairment factors, especially ADHD-IN and ADHD-HI, was much weaker between home and school (convergent correlations from .36 to .47 for IN and HI). The strong convergent validity of ADHD-IN and ADHD-HI scores within home and school in conjunction with weak convergent validity across home and school has implications for the assessment and diagnosis of ADHD (i.e., the diagnostic criteria of symptom occurrence in 2 or more settings).
机译:使用多指标x多特征x多来源x多场合设计来评估ADHD注意力不集中(IN),ADHD多动症/冲动(HI)的不变性,收敛性和判别有效性,以及儿童和青少年破坏性行为的学术障碍评分行为清单(CADBI),使用确认性因素分析。母亲,父亲,老师和助手对811名西班牙一年级儿童(男生占54%)完成了CADBI两次(间隔6周)。对于父母来说,像负荷,阈值/截距,因子均值,因子方差和因子协方差/相关性在来源和场合之间都是不变的。所有这三个因素还显示出趋同性(从.69到.83趋同)和显着的判别效度。对于教师和助手,参数也具有不变性,并且在来源和场合上具有收敛性和判别性(收敛相关性从0.67到0.87)。通过为家庭和学校建立构造效度,测试家庭和学校之间的构造效度是有意义的。家庭和学校之间,类似项目的负荷和阈值/截距是不变的,ADHD-HI因子的平均值在学校较低。家庭和学校之间,ADHD-IN,ADHD-HI和学术障碍因素(尤其是ADHD-IN和ADHD-HI)的收敛效度要弱得多(IN和HI的收敛相关系数从0.36到0.47)。家庭和学校内部ADHD-IN和ADHD-HI评分的强收敛效度,以及家庭和学校之间的弱收敛效度,对ADHD的评估和诊断(即,两种或两种以上症状发生的诊断标准)具有影响)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号