...
首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Nutrition >An accountability framework to promote healthy food environments.
【24h】

An accountability framework to promote healthy food environments.

机译:促进健康食品环境的问责框架。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To review the available literature on accountability frameworks to construct a framework that is relevant to voluntary partnerships between government and food industry stakeholders. Design: Between November 2012 and May 2013, a desk review of ten databases was conducted to identify principles, conceptual frameworks, underlying theories, and strengths and limitations of existing accountability frameworks for institutional performance to construct a new framework relevant to promoting healthy food environments. Setting: Food policy contexts within high-income countries to address obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases. Subjects: Eligible resources ( n 26) were reviewed and the guiding principles of fifteen interdisciplinary frameworks were used to construct a new accountability framework. Results: Strengths included shared principles across existing frameworks, such as trust, inclusivity, transparency and verification; government leadership and good governance; public deliberations; independent bodies recognizing compliance and performance achievements; remedial actions to improve accountability systems; and capacity to manage conflicts of interest and settle disputes. Limitations of the three-step frameworks and 'mutual accountability' approach were an explicit absence of an empowered authority to hold all stakeholders to account for their performance. Conclusions: We propose a four-step accountability framework to guide government and food industry engagement to address unhealthy food environments as part of a broader government-led strategy to address obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases. An independent body develops clear objectives, a governance process and performance standards for all stakeholders to address unhealthy food environments. The empowered body takes account (assessment), shares the account (communication), holds to account (enforcement) and responds to the account (improvements).
机译:目的:审查有关问责制框架的现有文献,以构建与政府和食品行业利益相关者之间的自愿伙伴关系相关的框架。设计:在2012年11月至2013年5月之间,对10个数据库进行了案头审查,以确定原则,概念框架,基础理论以及现有机构绩效问责框架的优势和局限性,以构建与促进健康食品环境有关的新框架。背景:高收入国家的粮食政策背景,以解决肥胖和饮食相关的非传染性疾病。主题:审查了合格的资源(n 26),并使用了15个跨学科框架的指导原则来构建新的问责制框架。结果:优势包括跨现有框架的共享原则,例如信任,包容性,透明度和验证;政府领导和善治;公众讨论;认可合规和绩效成就的独立机构;改善问责制的补救措施;处理利益冲突和解决争端的能力。三步框架和“相互问责制”方法的局限性在于,显然没有授权的权力要求所有利益相关方对其绩效负责。结论:我们提出了一个由四个步骤组成的问责制框架,以指导政府和食品行业参与解决不健康的食品环境,这是政府主导的解决肥胖和饮食相关的非传染性疾病战略的一部分。一个独立的机构为所有利益相关者制定明确的目标,治理流程和绩效标准,以解决不健康的食品环境。授权机构负责考虑(评估),共享客户(沟通),保留客户(执行)并响应客户(改进)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号