首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Suppressing Where but Not What: The Effect of Saccades on Dorsal- and Ventral-Stream Visual Processing
【24h】

Suppressing Where but Not What: The Effect of Saccades on Dorsal- and Ventral-Stream Visual Processing

机译:抑制何处而不是何处:扫视对背侧和腹侧流视觉处理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Some cognitive processes are suppressed during saccadic eye movements, whereas others are not. In two experiments, we investigated the locus of this interference effect. In one experiment, subjects decided whether pictured items were objects or nonobjects while making saccades of different lengths. Saccade distance had no effect on response time, indicating that saccades do not interfere with object recognition. However, in a second experiment, in which subjects decided whether pictured items faced to the left or to the right, response time increased with saccade distance, indicating that processing was suppressed during the saccade. These results (along with others) suggest that dorsal-stream (where) processes are suppressed during saccades, whereas ventral-stream (what) processes are not. Because the dorsal stream is instrumental in generating saccades, we propose that cognitive saccadic suppression results from dual-task interference within this visual subsystem.
机译:在眼球运动时,某些认知过程受到抑制,而另一些则没有。在两个实验中,我们研究了这种干扰效应的根源。在一个实验中,受试者在进行不同长度的扫视时,确定图片是物体还是非物体。扫视距离对响应时间没有影响,表明扫视不会干扰物体识别。但是,在第二个实验中,受测对象确定被摄物体是面向左侧还是面向右侧,响应时间随扫视距离的增加而增加,表明在扫视过程中处理受到抑制。这些结果(以及其他结果)表明,在扫视过程中,背流(其中)过程受到抑制,而腹侧流(什么)过程没有受到抑制。由于背流在产生扫视中起重要作用,因此我们提出认知扫视抑制是由该视觉子系统内的双任务干扰引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号