首页> 外文期刊>Progress in human geography >Beyond household economies: articulations and spaces of economic practice in postsocialism
【24h】

Beyond household economies: articulations and spaces of economic practice in postsocialism

机译:超越家庭经济:后社会主义中的经济实践的表述和空间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

While there has already been an engaged critique of the 'transition to capitalism', less work has explored the limits of the dominant capitalocentric accounts of postsocialism. In this paper, we argue that capitalist development in postsocialist societies should be seen as one part of a diverse economy, constituted by a host of economic practices articulated with one another in dynamic and complex ways and in multiple sites and spaces. To make this argument, we develop three interlinked points. First, we suggest that many of the prevailing conceptualizations of diverse economic practices in postsocialism fail to address adequately the multiple geographies within which such practices are constituted, enabled and constrained. Second, we argue that in much of the literature only limited attention has been paid to the articulation of capitalist and non-capitalist economies and to the mutually constitutive sets of social relations that underpin the diverse economies of postsocialism. Lastly, we focus on the political and moral economy of postsocialism's diverse economies and ask how these practices should be valued. We conclude by arguing that central to any understanding of the diverse economies of postsocialism must be a recognition of the power relations which shape and are shaped by the articulations and geographies of economic practices. This recognition, we argue, enables the possibility of reassessing the place, politics and value of such practices.
机译:尽管已经对“向资本主义过渡”进行了激烈的批评,但较少的工作探索了后社会主义占主导地位的以资本为中心的论述的局限性。在本文中,我们认为,后社会主义社会中的资本主义发展应被视为多样化经济的一部分,它由一系列以动态,复杂的方式,在多个场所和空间相互阐述的经济实践构成。为此,我们提出了三个相互联系的观点。首先,我们建议,后社会主义中许多流行的对多种经济实践的概念化未能充分解决构成,启用和限制这种实践的多个地区。其次,我们认为,在许多文献中,对资本主义经济体和非资本主义经济体的表述以及构成后社会主义多样化经济基础的相互构成的社会关系的关注很少。最后,我们关注后社会主义多元化经济的政治和道德经济,并询问应如何评价这些做法。我们最后得出结论,对后社会主义的多种经济的任何理解的中心必须是对权力关系的认识,这种权力关系是由经济实践的表述和地域所塑造的。我们认为,这种认识使人们有可能重新评估这种做法的位置,政治和价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号