首页> 外文期刊>Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics >Review on the Assessment of Safety and Risks
【24h】

Review on the Assessment of Safety and Risks

机译:安全与风险评估评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Historically explosion accidents are linked with energetic materials. There is the further belief, that the proneness to accidents-and their severity-is linked with the sensitivity of these explosives. Consed-quently there exist seemingly very insensitive materials for which it is believed that their accidental explositive materials for which it is beliveved that their accidental explosion can be ignored, so that safety distances can be redcued to those that apply to materials for which the hazard is assumed to be mass fire rather thanmass detonation. Evidence is presented here that shows these assumptions to be invalid. Reports of explosion accidents are gathered here for substances thart are not generally considered to be explosives (non UN-class 1 substances, like ammonium nitrate (AN), neat alklai metal chlorates, and evenhypochlorites and nitromethane). In most of these cases the proneness of accidents had not been foreseen by testing. The basic explosion mechanisms are of a more general nature than simply those that apply to high explosives. Explosion is not solely a matter of energy, but of any physical power conversion. In order to prove this, a survey of explosion events is given: Natural events, like the impacts of celestial bodies and volcanic eruptions. Fuel/liquid interactions in nature are industrial risks too, which occur at very different occasions and sites: Cellulose processing, the oil industry, foundries, power stations, explosions of hot cinders, chemical processing, fire extinguishing, and (most common) in the kitchen, and (most catastrophic) in nuclear reactors. Explosions of similar type ar Hydraulic Transients, Bubble resonance explaosions withthe possiblity of associated chemical room explosions (BLEVE), Rollovers. Second order effects are sorption/desorption resonance explosions, which most powerful also occur in nature (Nios lake (CO_2-release), Kivu Lake, Monoun Lake, 1984, Tanganjika Lake, all in Africa, and the Ocracoke inthe Gulf of Mexico (CH_4-release)-and at the lowest end shaken champagne bottles.
机译:历史上,爆炸事故与高能材料有关。人们进一步认为,容易发生事故及其严重程度与这些炸药的敏感性有关。因此,似乎存在着非常不敏感的材料,据信,对于它们的意外爆炸性材料,可以认为它们的意外爆炸可以忽略不计,因此可以将安全距离减小到适用于有危险的材料假定是大火而不是大量爆炸。这里提供的证据表明这些假设是无效的。此处收集的爆炸事故报告是关于通常不被认为是爆炸物的物质(非联合国1类物质,例如硝酸铵(AN),纯碱金属氯酸盐,次氯酸盐和硝基甲烷)。在大多数情况下,没有通过测试预见到事故的发生。基本爆炸机制具有比仅适用于高爆炸物的机制更笼统的性质。爆炸不仅是能量问题,而且还涉及任何物理功率转换。为了证明这一点,我们对爆炸事件进行了调查:自然事件,例如天体和火山爆发的影响。自然界中的燃料/液体相互作用也是工业风险,它发生在非常不同的场合和场所:纤维素加工,石油工业,铸造厂,电站,热煤渣爆炸,化学加工,灭火和(最常见的)厨房,以及(最致命的)核反应堆。相似类型的液压瞬变爆炸,气泡共振爆炸以及可能发生的相关化学室爆炸(BLEVE),翻转。二阶效应是吸附/解吸共振爆炸,它在自然界中也最强烈(Nios湖(释放CO_2),Kivu湖,Monoun湖,1984年,Tanganjika湖,都在非洲,以及墨西哥湾的Ocracoke(CH_4) -释放),然后在最低端摇动香槟瓶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号