...
首页> 外文期刊>Progress of Theoretical Physics >Quantal logic vs classical logic
【24h】

Quantal logic vs classical logic

机译:量子逻辑与经典逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two methods for the description of physical phenomena, microscopic and macroscopic, are necessary to understand the physical world. We now have two examples. The first one is mechanical, whether classical or quantal, vs thermodynamic treatments, which are characterized by reversibility and irreversibility, respectively. Another one is quantal vs classical theories, which have different forms of logic and lead to various paradoxes in measurement processes. To understand these contradicting aspects, it should be noted that in both cases, chaos and measurement are involved inevitably, and averages over small regions of space and time for measurement are required. In this way, chaos mediates between the two methods of description. We have already made an attempt to treat the former example in terms of ergodicity. In this paper the latter example will be treated with the theory of quantum measurement and the EPR paradox in mind.
机译:要了解物理世界,有两种描述物理现象的方法,即微观的和宏观的。我们现在有两个例子。第一个是机械的,无论是经典的还是定量的,都与热力学处理相对,分别以可逆性和不可逆性为特征。另一个是量子理论与经典理论,它们具有不同形式的逻辑,并导致测量过程中出现各种悖论。为了理解这些矛盾的方面,应该指出的是,在两种情况下,都不可避免地涉及到混乱和测量,并且需要在空间和测量的小区域内进行平均。这样,混乱在两种描述方法之间进行中介。我们已经尝试过从遍历的角度来对待前面的例子。在本文中,将使用量子测量理论和EPR悖论来对待后一个示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号