...
首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Organic Coatings: An International Review Journal >Use of electrochemical methods to examine different surface preparation methods for organic coatings on steel
【24h】

Use of electrochemical methods to examine different surface preparation methods for organic coatings on steel

机译:使用电化学方法检查钢上有机涂层的不同表面处理方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For preparation of steel surfaces before applying an organic coating, waterjetting is a modern, effective and environmentally friendly method. However there is a lack of data on its performance in terms of the subsequent protection afforded by the paint compared with more conventional methods. Hence previously exposed steel panels had their surfaces prepared in a variety of ways (abrasion, blasting with garnet entrained in water (10 K psi) and waterjetting without garnet at two velocities (20 K psi and 40 K psi)) prior to coating with two typical maintenance coatings. These were then exposed under immersion condition in the laboratory and monitored using the DC resistance method. Another set of samples were exposed in a salt spray test in accordance with ASTM B 117 for 500 h. At the end of both tests DC measurements were carried out and the samples were inspected visually in terms of blistering and rust. Results showed that both the immersion test and the salt spray test differentiated the surface preparations methods in the same order. Thus control panels performed the best. Nearly as good though were the two (20 K psi and 40 K psi) sets of waterjetted samples. The abraded samples were variable but overall provided less protection. The panels blasted with garnet entrained in water (10 K psi) samples proved to be the worst. Characterisation of the surfaces prior to coatings using the scanning electron microscope was also conducted. A tentative explanation for the differing protection afforded involving the integrity of the oxide film was suggested. Further work is needed to substantiate this. Overall, with samples in the immersion test, results using electrochemical methods proved themselves to be very effective in assessing and even predicting performance in a relatively short period of time. The results also correlated with the salt spray test. Also the work showed that waterjetting is a very effective way of preparing the surface prior to maintenance painting.
机译:为了在施加有机涂层之前准备钢表面,喷水是一种现代,有效且环保的方法。然而,与更常规的方法相比,就其提供的后续保护而言,缺乏有关其性能的数据。因此,先前暴露的钢板的表面以多种方式(磨蚀,在水中夹带石榴石的喷砂处理(10 K psi)和在不使用石榴石的情况下以两种速度喷水(20 K psi和40 K psi))进行表面处理,然后再涂覆两种典型的保养涂料。然后将它们在浸没条件下在实验室中曝光,并使用直流电阻法进行监控。根据ASTM B 117在盐雾试验中将另一组样品暴露500小时。在两个测试结束时,进行DC测量,并且目测检查样品是否起泡和生锈。结果表明,浸泡测试和盐雾测试均以相同顺序区分了表面处理方法。因此,控制面板性能最佳。两组(20 K psi和40 K psi)喷水样品几乎一样好。磨损的样品是可变的,但总体上提供较少的保护。用石榴石在水(10 K psi)中夹带的石榴石喷砂的面板被证明是最差的。还使用扫描电子显微镜对涂层进行了表面表征。建议对涉及氧化膜完整性的不同保护进行初步解释。需要进一步的工作来证实这一点。总体而言,对于浸入式测试中的样品,使用电化学方法的结果证明了它们在相对较短的时间内非常有效地评估甚至预测性能。结果也与盐雾试验相关。这项工作还表明,喷水是在维护喷漆之前准备表面的一种非常有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号