首页> 外文期刊>Progres en urologie: journal de l’Association francaise d’urologie et de la Societefrancaise d’urologie >Results of repeat midurethral sling for the treatment of recurrent female stress urinary incontinence [Résultats d'une deuxième bandelette sous-urétrale dans le traitement de l'incontinence urinaire d'effort féminine persistante ou récidivante]
【24h】

Results of repeat midurethral sling for the treatment of recurrent female stress urinary incontinence [Résultats d'une deuxième bandelette sous-urétrale dans le traitement de l'incontinence urinaire d'effort féminine persistante ou récidivante]

机译:重复尿道中段吊带治疗复发性女性压力性尿失禁的结果[第二次尿道下吊带治疗持续性或复发性女性压力性尿失禁的结果]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the results of a second midurethral sling (MUS) implantation after immediate or late recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women following a first MUS implantation. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective study of 36 patients who have had a second MUS between 2000 and 2011. All patients had preoperative urodynamic assessment using French validated scales (measurement of urinary handicap [MUH] and Ditrovie's scale) a correction of SUI by Ulmsten's test. The second tape was placed in the usual way without removal of the first one. The therapeutic results were evaluated by the presence or the absence of leaks as measured by MUH and Ditrovie's scale, and classified as "success" in the absence of leaks or the presence of small leaks without needing protection, "improvement" if significant decrease in urine leakage at subjective patient interview and "failed" in other cases. Results: The mean age of 36 patients was 64. ±. 9.6 years. Thirty patients had a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) as second tape and six patients had a transobturator tape. At 3 months, success rate was 74.3% (. n=. 26). Six patients had partial improvement (17.1%) and three patients had no improvement (8.6%). One was lost sight. After a follow-up of 5 years, these results remained unmodified for the ten patients reviewed. Conclusion: The implantation of a second MUS was a good option for women with persistence or recurrence of SUI after a first MUS implantation.
机译:目的:评估首次MUS植入后立即或晚期复发性压力性尿失禁(SUI)后第二次中尿道吊带(MUS)植入的结果。患者和方法:我们对2000年至2011年之间第二次MUS的36例患者进行了回顾性研究。所有患者均进行了术前尿动力学评估,采用的是法国验证的量表(尿残量[MUH]和Ditrovie量表),通过SUI校正乌尔姆斯滕的测试。将第二条胶带以通常的方式放置,而无需除去第一条胶带。通过使用MUH和Ditrovie量表评估是否存在渗漏来评估治疗结果,在不存在渗漏或无需保护的情况下存在小渗漏的情况下归为“成功”,如果尿液显着减少则归为“改善”在主观患者面试时出现渗漏,在其他情况下则“失败”。结果:36名患者的平均年龄为64.±。 9.6年30例患者使用无张力阴道胶带(TVT)作为第二根胶带,六例患者使用经闭孔胶带。在3个月时,成功率为74.3%(。n =。26)。 6例患者部分改善(17.1%),3例患者无改善(8.6%)。一个人看不见了。经过5年的随访,这10例患者的这些结果仍未改变。结论:对于初次MUS植入后持续性或复发性SUI的女性,第二次MUS植入是一个很好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号