首页> 外文期刊>Production Planning & Control >Card-based production control: a review of the control mechanisms underpinning Kanban, ConWIP, POLCA and COBACABANA systems
【24h】

Card-based production control: a review of the control mechanisms underpinning Kanban, ConWIP, POLCA and COBACABANA systems

机译:基于卡片的生产控制:对支持看板,ConWIP,POLCA和COBACABANA系统的控制机制的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Since the emergence of Kanban, there has been much research into card-based control systems. This has included attempts to improve Kanban and/or develop alternative systems, particularly ConWIP (i.e. Constant Work-In-Process), POLCA (i.e. Paired-cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorisation) and COBACABANA (i.e. Control of Balance by Card-Based Navigation). Yet, to date, no unifying review of the mechanisms underpinning these systems has been presented. As a consequence, managers are not provided with sufficient support for choosing an appropriate system for their shop; and researchers lack a clear picture of how the mechanisms compare, leading to several misconceptions. This paper reviews the control mechanisms underpinning the Kanban, ConWIP, POLCA and COBACABANA systems. By comparing the control mechanism' (i.e. the loop structure and card properties) and contextual factors' (i.e. routing variability, processing time variability, and whether stations are decoupled by inventory or the flow of jobs is controlled), we provide managers with guidance on which system to choose. For research, we show for example that most criticisms put forward against Kanban systems, e.g. to justify the development of ConWIP, POLCA or COBACABANA, only apply to work-in-process Kanban systems and not to production Kanban systems. Future research directions for each control system are outlined.
机译:自看板出现以来,对基于卡的控制系统进行了大量研究。这包括改善看板和/或开发替代系统的尝试,特别是ConWIP(即,在制品的持续工作),POLCA(即具有授权的卡的成对单元重叠环)和COBACABANA(即,基于卡的余额控制)导航)。但是,到目前为止,还没有对构成这些系统基础的机制进行统一审查。结果,没有为经理提供足够的支持来为其商店选择合适的系统。研究人员对机制的比较缺乏清晰的了解,从而导致了一些误解。本文回顾了看板,ConWIP,POLCA和COBACABANA系统的控制机制。通过比较控制机制(即循环结构和卡属性)和上下文因素(即路由可变性,处理时间可变性以及工作站是否通过库存分离或控制工作流程),我们为管理人员提供了指导选择哪个系统。对于研究,我们举例说明,大多数批评是针对看板系统提出的,例如为证明开发ConWIP,POLCA或COBACABANA的合理性,仅适用于在制品看板系统,不适用于生产看板系统。概述了每个控制系统的未来研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号