首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological sciences >Why fruit rots: theoretical support for Janzen's theory of microbe-macrobe competition
【24h】

Why fruit rots: theoretical support for Janzen's theory of microbe-macrobe competition

机译:为什么水果腐烂:为詹森微生物-宏观竞争理论提供理论支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present a formal model of Janzen's influential theory that competition for resources between microbes and vertebrates causes microbes to be selected to make these resources unpalatable to vertebrates. That is, fruit rots, seeds mould and meat spoils, in part, because microbes gain a selective advantage if they can alter the properties of these resources to avoid losing the resources to vertebrate consumers. A previous model had failed to find circumstances in which such a costly spoilage trait could flourish; here,we present a simple analytic model of a general situation where costly microbial spoilage is selected and persists. We argue that the key difference between the two models lies in their treatments of microbial dispersal. If microbial dispersal is sufficiently spatially constrained that different resource items can have differing microbial communities, then spoilage will be selected; however, if microbial dispersal has a strong homogenizing effect on the microbial community then spoilage will not be selected. We suspect that both regimes will exist in the natural world, and suggest how future empirical studies could explore the influence of microbial dispersal on spoilage.
机译:我们提出了詹森影响理论的形式化模型,即微生物和脊椎动物之间对资源的竞争会导致微生物被选择,从而使这些资源对脊椎动物不利。也就是说,水果腐烂,种子发霉和肉变质,部分原因是微生物如果能够改变这些资源的特性,从而避免将资源流失给脊椎动物,则会获得选择优势。先前的模型未能发现这种代价高昂的腐败特征可能会持续发展的环境。在这里,我们提出了一种普遍情况的简单分析模型,在这种情况下,代价高昂的微生物变质被选择并持续存在。我们认为,这两种模型之间的主要区别在于它们对微生物扩散的处理。如果微生物的散布受到足够的空间限制,以至于不同的资源项目可能具有不同的微生物群落,则将选择腐败。但是,如果微生物散布对微生物群落具有很强的均质作用,则不会选择变质。我们怀疑这两种制度都将存在于自然界中,并建议未来的经验研究如何探索微生物扩散对腐败的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号