首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital and disaster medicine : >Emergency Nursing Staff Dispatch: Sensitivity and Specificity in Detecting Prehospital Need for Physician Interventions During Ambulance Transport in Rovigo Emergency Ambulance Service, Italy
【24h】

Emergency Nursing Staff Dispatch: Sensitivity and Specificity in Detecting Prehospital Need for Physician Interventions During Ambulance Transport in Rovigo Emergency Ambulance Service, Italy

机译:紧急护理人员调度:意大利罗维戈紧急救护车的救护车运输过程中检测院前干预医生的敏感性和特异性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: In Italy, administration of medications or advanced procedures dictates the prehospital presence of a physician to initiate treatment. Nursing staff is often used as dispatchers in Italian emergency medical ambulance services. There is little data about nursing dispatch performance in detecting high-acuity patients who need prehospital medications and procedures.Objective: To determine the ability of a dispatch center staffed by emergency ambulance nurses to detect prehospital need for physician interventions in the context of a semi-rural area Emergency Medical Services system.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 53,606 calls from the Rovigo Emergency Ambulance Services' database was undertaken. Physician prehospital interventions were defined as the administration of medications or procedures (advanced airway management and ventilation, pneumothorax decompression, fluid replacement therapy, external defibrillation, cardioversion and pacing). The dispatch codes (assigned by a subjective decision-making process as Red, Yellow, or Green) of all transported prehospital patient calls were matched with an out-of-hospital triage system staffed by clinicians to determine the number of correctly identified prehospital need of physician interventions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.Results: The sensitivity of subjective experience-based nursing dispatch in detecting the need for physician interventions was 78.0% (95% CI, 76.996-79.1%), with a PPV of 36.6% (95% CI, 35.896-37.5%). Specificity was 83.8% (95% CI: 83.4%-84.1%), with an NPV of 96.9% (95% CI, 96.8%-97.1%).Conclusion: A dispatch center staffed by nurses with six years of experience and three months of training correctly identified when not to send a doctor to the scene in the absence of need for physician interventions, using a subjective decision-making process. The nurses staffing the dispatch center also worked in the field. Dispatch center staff were not able to predict when there was no need for physician interventions in high-acuity dispatch code patients, resulting in an over-triage and use of emergency physicians on scene.
机译:简介:在意大利,药物的管理或高级程序决定了医生在院前应开始治疗。护理人员通常在意大利紧急医疗救护服务中用作调度员。关于在需要院前药物和程序的高危患者中进行护理调度性能的数据很少。目的:确定由急救急救护士配备的调度中心在半干预情况下检测医院干预前医院需求的能力。方法:对罗维戈紧急救护车服务数据库中的53,606个呼叫进行了回顾性分析。医师院前干预的定义为药物或手术的管理(先进的气道管理和通气,气胸减压,补液治疗,体外除颤,心脏复律和起搏)。将所有运输的院前患者呼叫的调度代码(由主观决策过程分配为红色,黄色或绿色)与临床医生配备的院外分类系统进行匹配,以确定正确识别的院前需求的数量。医师干预。结果:计算基于主观经验的护理调度对发现医生干预的敏感度为78.0%(95%CI,76.996-79.1%),其敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)被计算出来。 ),PPV为36.6%(95%CI,35.896-37.5%)。特异性为83.8%(95%CI:83.4%-84.1%),NPV为96.9%(95%CI,96.8%-97.1%)。结论:派遣中心由拥有6年经验和3个月经验的护士组成使用主观决策过程,可以正确地确定在不需要医生干预的情况下何时不派医生到现场的培训。为调度中心配备人员的护士也在现场工作。调度中心的工作人员无法预测何时不需要对高效率调度代码患者进行医师干预,从而导致过度分诊和现场急诊医师的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号