首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H. Journal of Engineering in Medicine >Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty
【24h】

Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty

机译:导针轴在计算机辅助和人工股骨头表面置换术中定位的可重复性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The orientation of the femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty affects the likelihood of loosening and fracture. Computer-assisted surgery has been shown to improve significantly the surgeon's ability to achieve a desired position and orientation; nevertheless, both bias and variability in positioning remain and can potentially be improved. The authors recently developed a computer-assisted surgical (CAS) technique to guide the placement of the pin used in femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty and showed that it produced significantly less variation than a typical manual technique in varus/valgus placement relative to a pre-operatively determined surgical plan while taking a comparable amount of time. In the present study, the repeatability of both the CAS and manual techniques is evaluated in order to estimate the relative contributions to overall variability of surgical technique (CAS versus manual), surgeon experience (novice versus experienced), and other sources of variability (e.g. across specimens and across surgeons). This will enable further improvements in the accuracy of CAS techniques. Three residents/fellows new to femoral head resurfacing and three experienced hip arthroplasty surgeons performed 20-30 repetitions of each of the CAS and manual techniques on at least one of four cadaveric femur specimens. The CAS system had markedly better repeatability (1.2°) in varus/valgus placement relative to the manual technique (2.8°), slightly worse repeatability in version (4.4° versus 3.2°), markedly better repeatability in mid-neck placement (0.7 mm versus 2.5 mm), no significant dependence on surgeon skill level (in contrast to the manual technique), and took significantly less time (50 s versus 123 s). Proposed improvements to the version measurement process showed potential for reducing the standard deviation by almost two thirds.This study supports the use of CAS for femoral head resurfacing as it is quicker than the manual technique, independent of surgeon experience, and demonstrates improved repeatability.
机译:髋关节表面置换术中股骨组件的方向会影响松动和骨折的可能性。事实证明,计算机辅助手术可以显着提高外科医生获得所需位置和方向的能力。但是,定位的偏差和可变性仍然存在,并且有可能得到改善。作者最近开发了一种计算机辅助外科手术(CAS)技术,以指导股骨头表面置换人工关节置换术中使用的销钉的放置,并表明与术前相比,其在内翻/外翻放置中产生的变异明显少于典型的手动技术确定的手术计划,同时花费相当长的时间。在本研究中,对CAS和手动技术的可重复性进行了评估,以评估对手术技术(CAS与手动),外科医师经验(新手与经验)以及其他可变性来源(例如,跨标本和跨外科医生)。这将能够进一步提高CAS技术的准确性。三名股骨头表面置换的住院医师/研究员和三名经验丰富的髋关节置换术医师对至少四个尸体股骨标本中的一个进行了20-30次重复CAS和手工操作。相对于手动技术(2.8°),CAS系统在内翻/外翻放置中的可重复性(1.2°)明显更好,在版本上的可重复性(4.4°对3.2°)稍差,在颈中部放置(0.7 mm)中的可重复性明显更好相对于2.5毫米),对外科医生技能水平的依赖性不明显(与手动技术相比),并且所用时间明显减少(50 s对123 s)。提议的版本测量过程改进显示出将标准偏差降低近三分之二的潜力。这项研究支持使用CAS进行股骨头表面置换,因为它比手工技术要快,且不受外科医生的经验影响,并显示出提高的可重复性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号