首页> 外文期刊>Precision Agriculture >Managing for Fine-Scale Differences in Inoculum Load: Seeding Patterns to Minimize Wheat Yield Loss to Take-all
【24h】

Managing for Fine-Scale Differences in Inoculum Load: Seeding Patterns to Minimize Wheat Yield Loss to Take-all

机译:应对接种量的细微差异:播种方式可将小麦的总产量损失降至最低

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For pathogens with highly localized inoculum, controlled positioning of susceptible plants can be used to delay exposure to the pathogen. For example, when wheat is direct-drilled in fields where wheat was infected by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt) in the previous season, the remaining rows of wheat crowns serve as an inoculum source for the new wheat planting. In order to determine how different seeding patterns of wheat might affect yield loss to Ggt, we constructed a mathematical modelin three stages. First, we calculated the probability density function for the distance between a new seed and the nearest old row of crowns for two main planting scenarios: parallel to the previous year's rows or at an angle to them. Second, we used estimates from Kabbage and Bockus [Kabbage, M. and Bockus, W. W. 2002. Plant Disease 86, 298-303] of the yield loss to Ggt as a function of the distance between wheat seed and inoculum source. Third, we combined these two models to estimate the average yield loss for different planting patterns. We estimated that planting parallel to and between the previous year's rows would cut yield loss almost in half for a typical row spacing compared to angled planting, provided there was not an important offset, orbias, in the position of the parallel planting. Planter wobble was relatively unimportant if there was no systematic bias in position.
机译:对于具有高度局部接种的病原体,可以使用易感植物的受控定位来延迟对病原体的暴露。例如,当小麦在小麦被禾本科禾本科病菌感染的田间直接钻探时。 Tritici(Ggt)在上一个季节中,其余的小麦冠冠用作新小麦播种的接种源。为了确定小麦的不同播种方式可能如何影响Ggt的产量损失,我们分三个阶段构建了数学模型。首先,我们针对两种主要种植情况计算了新种子与最接近的老冠之间的距离的概率密度函数:与上一年的行平行或成一定角度。其次,我们使用了来自Kabbage和Bockus的估计值[Kabbage,M.和Bockus,W. W. 2002. Plant Disease 86,298-303],其对Ggt的产量损失随小麦种子和接种源之间的距离而变化。第三,我们结合这两个模型来估算不同种植方式下的平均产量损失。我们估计,与平行种植相比,与上一年度行之间和之间进行的播种,与典型的行距相比,将平行种植的位置减少几乎一半的产量损失,前提是平行种植位置没有重要的偏移量(斜度)。如果没有系统的位置偏差,则播种机的摆动相对不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号