...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Food insecurity and social protection in Europe: Quasi-natural experiment of Europe's great recessions 2004-2012
【24h】

Food insecurity and social protection in Europe: Quasi-natural experiment of Europe's great recessions 2004-2012

机译:欧洲的粮食不安全和社会保护:2004-2012年欧洲大衰退的准自然实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Food insecurity rose sharply in Europe after 2009, but marked variation exists across countries and over time. We test whether social protection programs protected people from food insecurity arising from economic hardship across Europe. Data on household food insecurity covering 21 EU countries from 2004 to 2012 were taken from Eurostat 2015 edition and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Cross-national first difference models were used to evaluate how rising unemployment and declining wages related to changes in the prevalence of food insecurity and the role of social protection expenditure in modifying observed effects. Economic hardship was strongly associated with greater food insecurity. Each 1 percentage point rise in unemployment rates was associated with an estimated 0.29 percentage point rise in food insecurity (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.49). Similarly, each $1000 decreases in annual average wages was associated with a 0.62 percentage point increase in food insecurity (95% CI: 0.27 to 0.97). Greater social protection spending mitigated these risks. Each $1000 spent per capita reduced the associations of rising unemployment and declining wages with food insecurity by 0.05 percentage points (95% CI:-0.10 to -0.0007) and 0.10 (95% CI:-0.18 to -0.006), respectively. The estimated effects of economic hardship on food insecurity became insignificant when countries spent more than $10,000 per capita on social protection. Rising unemployment and falling wages are strong statistical determinants of increasing food insecurity, but at high levels of social protection, these associations could be prevented. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:2009年之后,欧洲的粮食不安全状况急剧上升,但随着时间的推移,各国之间存在明显的差异。我们测试了社会保护计划是否可以保护人们免受整个欧洲经济困难引起的粮食不安全状况的影响。 2004年至2012年涵盖21个欧盟国家的家庭粮食不安全数据取自《欧盟统计》 2015版和经济合作与发展组织。跨国第一差异模型用于评估失业率上升和工资下降与粮食不安全流行率的变化以及社会保护支出在改变观察到的影响中的作用之间的关系。经济困难与更大的粮食不安全状况密切相关。失业率每上升1个百分点,则与粮食不安全状况估计增加0.29个百分点相关(95%CI:0.10至0.49)。同样,每年平均工资每下降1000美元,粮食不安全状况就会增加0.62个百分点(95%CI:0.27至0.97)。增加社会保护支出可以减轻这些风险。人均每支出1000美元,就使失业率上升和工资下降与粮食不安全的相关性分别降低了0.05个百分点(95%CI:-0.10至-0.0007)和0.10(95%CI:-0.18至-0.006)。当各国人均在社会保护上花费超过10,000美元时,估计的经济困难对粮食不安全的影响就变得微不足道了。失业率上升和工资下降是增加粮食不安全状况的强有力的统计决定因素,但是在高水平的社会保护下,可以避免这些联系。 (C)2016作者。由Elsevier Inc.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号