首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Effect of a community action program on adult quit smoking rates in rural australian towns: the CART project.
【24h】

Effect of a community action program on adult quit smoking rates in rural australian towns: the CART project.

机译:一项社区行动计划对澳大利亚农村乡村成年人戒烟率的影响:CART项目。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND. This article describes one outcome of a randomized controlled trial of community action for cancer prevention. The aims of this article were to (a) explore the effectiveness of a community action program in decreasing community smoking rates in rural Australian towns and (b) describe the relationship between adult smoking quit and uptake rates and demographic variables. METHODS.In 1992, 20 towns were selected for randomization. Community action involved formation of community committees and utilization of access point networks to initiate and maintain intervention strategies. At post-test, outcomes were proportion of "quitters" from a cohort of self-described smokers, proportion of "uptakers" from a cohort of self-described nonsmokers, and "net effect." RESULTS. Differences in quit rate, uptake rate, and net effect for intervention compared to control condition favored the intervention in all cases, although mainly nonsignificant. Significantly more male smokers quit in intervention towns than in control towns [7.0% (95% CI: 0.6, 13.5)]. CONCLUSIONS. Given that CART utilized and improved upon strategies argued as effective in the literature, the limited success of the project in reducing adult smoking, considered in combination with COMMIT findings, suggests the need for further innovation in the field. Copyright American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
机译:背景。本文介绍了一项社区预防癌症行动的随机对照试验的一项结果。本文的目的是(a)探索社区行动计划在降低澳大利亚农村城镇的社区吸烟率方面的有效性,以及(b)描述成人吸烟戒烟与摄入率和人口统计学变量之间的关系。方法.1992年,选择20个镇进行随机化。社区行动包括成立社区委员会和利用接入点网络来发起和维护干预策略。在测试后,结果是自描述为吸烟者的群体中“戒烟者”的比例,自描述为不吸烟者的群体中“摄取者”的比例以及“净效应”。结果。与对照组相比,干预的戒烟率,吸收率和净效果的差异在所有情况下均有利于干预,尽管主要无意义。在干预镇戒烟的男性吸烟者明显多于在控制镇[7.0%(95%CI:0.6,13.5)]。结论。鉴于CART利用并改进了文献中认为有效的策略,结合COMMIT的发现,该项目在减少成人吸烟方面取得的成功有限,这表明需要在该领域进行进一步的创新。版权所有美国卫生基金会和学术出版社。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号