首页> 外文期刊>Powder Technology: An International Journal on the Science and Technology of Wet and Dry Particulate Systems >Roller compaction/Dry granulation: Use of the thin layer model for predicting densities and forces during roller compaction
【24h】

Roller compaction/Dry granulation: Use of the thin layer model for predicting densities and forces during roller compaction

机译:辊压实/干法制粒:使用薄层模型预测辊压实的密度和力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The thin layer model is based on the assumption that the deformation of powder during tableting can be transferred to the roller compaction process, provided that it was established with sufficient accuracy in the tableting experiments. In particular, the process of compaction between the rolls is presumed to consist of three parts, a rearrangement, an "exponential" and an elastic recovery phase. The rearrangement and "exponential" phases are used to calculate the densification of the material. The forces between the rolls during elastic recovery, the third phase, proved to be essential to the prediction, because 20% to 30% of the total roller compaction force is required to counteract ribbon recovery. Four different excipients and one powder blend were tested in the model. For two materials, the density and force predictions turned out to be accurate within ±2.5% and ±10%, respectively. For one excipient and the model blend, the predictions deviated systematically whereas those for the remaining excipient were within the above mentioned limits in ca. 50% of the experiments. For explaining these differences, we evaluated both the influence of the course of the force-time profile, at comparable densification times, and the influence of different compression times, for comparable force-time profiles. Finally, the impact of density distributions within ribbons on the prediction was estimated.
机译:薄层模型基于这样的假设:只要在压片实验中以足够的精度建立粉末,就可以将压片过程中粉末的变形转移到辊压过程中。特别地,假定辊之间的压实过程包括三个部分,即重排,“指数”和弹性恢复阶段。重排和“指数”相用于计算材料的致密化。事实证明,在弹性恢复(第三阶段)过程中,轧辊之间的力对于预测至关重要,因为需要总辊压实力的20%至30%来抵消色带的恢复。在模型中测试了四种不同的赋形剂和一种粉末混合物。对于两种材料,密度和力的预测结果分别精确到±2.5%和±10%之内。对于一种赋形剂和模型混合物,预测系统性地偏离,而其余赋形剂的预测在上述极限范围内。 50%的实验。为了解释这些差异,我们在可比的致密时间下评估了力-时间曲线过程的影响,以及在可比的力-时间曲线下评估了不同压缩时间的影响。最后,估计了色带内密度分布对预测的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号