...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical research in toxicology >Effects of N 2-alkylguanine, O 6-alkylguanine, and abasic lesions on DNA binding and bypass synthesis by the euryarchaeal B-family DNA polymerase vent (exo -)
【24h】

Effects of N 2-alkylguanine, O 6-alkylguanine, and abasic lesions on DNA binding and bypass synthesis by the euryarchaeal B-family DNA polymerase vent (exo -)

机译:N 2烷基鸟嘌呤,O 6烷基鸟嘌呤和无碱基损伤对乙二醛B族DNA聚合酶排放孔(exo-)的DNA结合和旁路合成的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Archaeal and eukaryotic B-family DNA polymerases (pols) mainly replicate chromosomal DNA but stall at lesions, which are often bypassed with Y-family pols. In this study, a B-family pol Vent (exo -) from the euryarchaeon Thermococcus litoralis was studied with three types of DNA lesions-N 2-alkylG, O 6-alkylG, and an abasic (AP) site-in comparison with a model Y-family pol Dpo4 from Sulfolobus solfataricus, to better understand the effects of various DNA modifications on binding, bypass efficiency, and fidelity of pols. Vent (exo -) readily bypassed N 2-methyl(Me)G and O 6-MeG, but was strongly blocked at O 6-benzyl(Bz)G and N 2-BzG, whereas Dpo4 efficiently bypassed N 2-MeG and N 2-BzG and partially bypassed O 6-MeG and O 6-BzG. Vent (exo -) bypassed an AP site to an extent greater than Dpo4, corresponding with steady-state kinetic data. Vent (exo -) showed ~110-, 180-, and 300-fold decreases in catalytic efficiency (k cat/K m) for nucleotide insertion opposite an AP site, N 2-MeG, and O 6-MeG but ~1800- and 5000-fold decreases opposite O 6-BzG and N 2-BzG, respectively, as compared to G, whereas Dpo4 showed little or only ~13-fold decreases opposite N 2-MeG and N 2-BzG but ~260-370-fold decreases opposite O 6-MeG, O 6-BzG, and the AP site. Vent (exo -) preferentially misinserted G opposite N 2-MeG, T opposite O 6-MeG, and A opposite an AP site and N 2-BzG, while Dpo4 favored correct C insertion opposite those lesions. Vent (exo -) and Dpo4 both bound modified DNAs with affinities similar to unmodified DNA. Our results indicate that Vent (exo -) is as or more efficient as Dpo4 in synthesis opposite O 6-MeG and AP lesions, whereas Dpo4 is much or more efficient opposite (only) N 2-alkylGs than Vent (exo -), irrespective of DNA-binding affinity. Our data also suggest that Vent (exo -) accepts nonbulky DNA lesions (e.g., N 2- or O 6-MeG and an AP site) as manageable substrates despite causing error-prone synthesis, whereas Dpo4 strongly favors minor-groove N 2-alkylG lesions over major-groove or noninstructive lesions.
机译:古细菌和真核生物B族DNA聚合酶(pols)主要复制染色体DNA,但停滞在病变处,而这些病变常被Y家族pols所绕过。在这项研究中,研究了来自euryarchaeon litorcoccus litoralis的B家族pol Vent(exo-)与三种DNA损伤类型-N 2-烷基G,O 6-烷基G和无碱基(AP)位点,并与为了从Sulfolobus solfataricus中获得Y家族pol Dpo4模型,以更好地了解各种DNA修饰对pols的结合,旁路效率和保真度的影响。排气孔(exo-)容易绕过N 2-甲基(Me)G和O 6-MeG,但在O 6-苄基(Bz)G和N 2-BzG处被强烈阻滞,而Dpo4有效绕过N 2-MeG和N 2-BzG,部分绕过O 6-MeG和O 6-BzG。通风口(exo-)绕过AP部位的程度大于Dpo4,与稳态动力学数据相对应。 Vent(exo-)在与AP位置,N 2-MeG和O 6-MeG相反的核苷酸插入处的催化效率(k cat / K m)降低了约110-,180-和300倍,但在约1800-与G相比,O 6-BzG和N 2-BzG分别降低了5000倍;而Dpo4与N 2-MeG和N 2-BzG相对降低了很少或只有〜13倍,而〜260-370- O 6-MeG,O 6-BzG和AP部位的对数减少。通风孔(exo-)优先向N 2-MeG相对的G插入错误,对O 6-MeG相对的T插入错误,而对AP位点和N 2-BzG相对的A优先插入,而Dpo4则倾向于在这些病变相对的位置正确插入C。排气孔(exo-)和Dpo4都以与未修饰的DNA相似的亲和力结合修饰的DNA。我们的结果表明,在合成O 6-MeG和AP病变的同时,Vent(exo-)的效率与Dpo4相同或更高,而与Vent(exo-)相对,Dpo4相对于(仅)N 2-烷基Gs效率更高或更高。 DNA结合亲和力。我们的数据还表明,Vent(exo-)可以接受非大体的DNA损伤(例如N 2-或O 6-MeG和AP位点)作为易于控制的底物,尽管会导致容易出错的合成,而Dpo4则强烈支持较小凹槽的N 2-烷基G病变超过主要凹槽或非指导性病变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号