首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >PARENTERAL MIDAZOLAM IS SUPERIOR TO DIAZEPAM FOR TREATMENT OF PREHOSPITAL SEIZURES
【24h】

PARENTERAL MIDAZOLAM IS SUPERIOR TO DIAZEPAM FOR TREATMENT OF PREHOSPITAL SEIZURES

机译:腹腔注射咪达唑仑比地西EPA更能治疗院前麻醉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction. Diazepam and midazolam are commonly used by paramedics to treat seizures. A period of drug scarcity was used as an opportunity to compare their effectiveness in treating prehospital seizures. Methods. A retrospective chart review of a single, large, commercial agency during a 29-month period was performed. The period included alternating shortages of both medications. Ambulances were stocked with either diazepam or midazolam based on availability of the drugs. Adult patients who received at least 1 parenteral dose of diazepam or midazolam for treatment of seizures were included. The regional prehospital protocol recommended 5 mg intravenous (IV) diazepam, 5 mg intramuscular (IM) diazepam, 5 mg IM midazolam, or 2.5 mg IV midazolam. Medication effectiveness was compared with respect to the primary end point: cessation of seizure without repeat seizure during the prehospital encounter. Results. A total of 440 study subjects received 577 administrations of diazepam or midazolam and met the study criteria. The subjects were 52% male, with a mean age of 48 (range 18-94) years. A total of 237 subjects received 329 doses of diazepam, 64 (27%) were treated with first-dose IM. A total of 203 subjects received 248 doses of midazolam; 71 (35%) were treated with first-dose IM. Seizure stopped and did not recur in 49% of subjects after parenteral diazepam and 65% of subjects after parenteral midazolam (p = 0.002). Diazepam and midazolam exhibited similar first dose success for IV administration (58 vs. 62%; p = 0.294). Age, gender, seizure history, hypoglycemia, the presence of trauma, time to first administration, prehospital contact time, and frequency of IM administration were similar between groups. Conclusion. For parenteral administration, midazolam demonstrated superior first-dose seizure suppression. This study demonstrates how periods of drug scarcity can be utilized to study prehospital medication effectiveness.
机译:介绍。地西ics和咪达唑仑常被医务人员用来治疗癫痫发作。一段时间的药物短缺被用作比较其治疗院前癫痫发作有效性的机会。方法。在29个月内对一家大型商业代理商进行了回顾性图表审查。该时期包括两种药物交替短缺。根据药物的可用性,救护车中会放有地西epa或咪达唑仑。包括接受至少1剂胃肠外剂量地西epa或咪达唑仑治疗癫痫发作的成年患者。院前区域协议建议使用5 mg静脉(IV)地西epa,5 mg肌内(IM)地西epa,5 mg IM咪达唑仑或2.5 mg IV咪达唑仑。在主要终点上比较了药物的有效性:院前遭遇癫痫发作而不再反复发作。结果。共有440名研究对象接受了577种地西epa或咪达唑仑的给药,并符合研究标准。受试者为52%的男性,平均年龄为48岁(18-94岁)。共有237名受试者接受了329剂量的地西epa治疗,其中64例(27%)接受了首剂IM治疗。总共203名受试者接受了248剂咪达唑仑; 71例(35%)患者接受了首剂IM治疗。胃肠外注射地西epa后癫痫发作停止且没有复发,在咪达唑仑肠胃外注射后癫痫发作不再发生,占49%(p = 0.002)。地西p和咪达唑仑在静脉内给药中显示出相似的首次剂量成功率(58比62%; p = 0.294)。两组之间的年龄,性别,癫痫病史,低血糖症,外伤的存在,首次给药时间,院前接触时间和IM的发生频率相似。结论。对于肠胃外给药,咪达唑仑显示出优异的首剂癫痫发作抑制作用。这项研究表明如何利用药物短缺时期来研究院前用药的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号