首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >A comparison of ketamine and morphine analgesia in prehospital trauma care: A cluster randomized clinical trial in rural quang tri province, vietnam
【24h】

A comparison of ketamine and morphine analgesia in prehospital trauma care: A cluster randomized clinical trial in rural quang tri province, vietnam

机译:氯胺酮和吗啡镇痛在院前创伤护理中的比较:在越南广三省农村进行的一项集群随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. The use of opioid analgesics in prehospital trauma care has been reported to have negative side effects on the airway and circulation. Several studies of urban trauma management have recommend ketamine as a safe and efficient analgesic. To date, however, no controlled trials of prehospital opioid analgesics versus ketamine in rural trauma management have been published. Objective. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects and side effects of ketamine and morphine in a prehospital, low-resource setting. Methods. The study was conducted with a prospective, cluster-randomized design. The Quang Tri province of Vietnam was divided into two sectors that alternated monthly between ketamine and morphine treatments. A total of 169 trauma patients were treated outside hospital settings with ketamine, while 139 patients were treated with morphine. Results. The treatment effects were measured by comparing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ratings in the field to those upon on admission. The analgesic effects were positive and similar for the two drugs. The rate of vomiting was significantly lower in the ketamine group (5%) than in the morphine group (19%, 95% CI for difference 8-22%). The rate of hallucinations and agitation was higher in ketamine-treated patients (11%) than in the morphine-treated patients (1.5%, 95% CI for difference 4-16%). In this study, patients with head trauma (n = 57) showed no adverse effects on consciousness level after being treated with ketamine. Conclusion. Ketamine had an analgesic effect similar to morphine and carried a lower risk of airway problems. The risk of hallucinations and agitation was increased in the ketamine group. These findings are of medical significance, particularly in rough and low-resource scenarios.
机译:背景。据报道,在院前创伤护理中使用阿片类镇痛药会对气道和血液循环产生负面影响。几项关于城市创伤管理的研究建议将氯胺酮作为一种安全有效的止痛药。然而,迄今为止,尚未发表院前阿片类镇痛药与氯胺酮在农村创伤治疗中的对照试验。目的。这项研究旨在比较氯胺酮和吗啡在院前资源贫乏地区的镇痛作用和副作用。方法。该研究采用前瞻性,集群随机设计进行。越南的广三省被分为两个部门,每月交替进行氯胺酮和吗啡治疗。共有169名创伤患者在医院外接受氯胺酮治疗,而139例患者接受吗啡治疗。结果。通过比较现场的视觉模拟量表(VAS)等级与入院时的等级来衡量治疗效果。这两种药物的镇痛作用是积极的并且相似。氯胺酮组(5%)的呕吐率显着低于吗啡组(19%,95%CI,差异8-22%)。氯胺酮治疗的患者(11%)的幻觉和躁动发生率高于吗啡治疗的患者(1.5%,95%CI,差异4-16%)。在这项研究中,头颅外伤患者(n = 57)在用氯胺酮治疗后未对意识水平产生不良影响。结论。氯胺酮具有与吗啡相似的镇痛作用,并且降低了气道问题的风险。氯胺酮组增加了幻觉和躁动的风险。这些发现具有医学意义,特别是在资源匮乏的粗糙环境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号