首页> 外文期刊>Postgraduate Medical Journal >Do we know what foundation year doctors think about patient safety incident reporting? Development of a Web based tool to assess attitude and knowledge.
【24h】

Do we know what foundation year doctors think about patient safety incident reporting? Development of a Web based tool to assess attitude and knowledge.

机译:我们是否知道预科医师对患者安全事件报告有何看法?开发基于Web的工具以评估态度和知识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Making healthcare safer is an international priority. Patient safety modules are now taught in medical schools, and methods to assess related student knowledge and attitudes have been developed. However, little is known about the attitudes and knowledge which foundation doctors are developing to patient safety and incident reporting in the healthcare workplace, since a specific assessment tool appears to be lacking. AIMS: To develop, content validate and pilot test an online questionnaire survey to elicit foundation doctors' knowledge and experience of patient safety and incident reporting, and assess related attitudes and behaviours. METHODS: Questionnaire content validity was facilitated through: a steering group; literature review; feedback from foundation year doctors and consultant staff; a modified Delphi group; and completion of a content validity index by experts. In 2010 a cross-sectional online survey of 110 foundation year 1 and 2 doctors was then undertaken in three Scottish NHS board areas, utilising the developed 25 item questionnaire. RESULTS: The questionnaire was validated, and piloted among 69 foundation year doctors who responded to the questionnaire. The pilot has provided valuable insights into trainee attitudes and experience. For example, 32 (48%) believed that most safety incidents were due to things that they could not do anything about; and 31 (43%) admitted to being involved in medication errors which were not formally reported. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot study was successful in taking the first steps to developing a validated survey questionnaire for a key staff group, foundation year doctors, in a priority area. However, the findings raise concerns about trainee experience of and attitudes to reporting, and the frequency with which incidents go unreported.
机译:背景:使医疗保健更安全是国际优先事项。现在,在医学院开设了患者安全模块,并开发了评估相关学生知识和态度的方法。但是,由于似乎缺乏特定的评估工具,基金会医生在医疗保健工作场所对患者安全和事件报告的态度和知识知之甚少。目的:开发,内容验证和试点在线问卷调查,以获取基础医生对患者安全和事件报告的知识和经验,并评估相关的态度和行为。方法:调查问卷内容的有效性通过以下方式得到促进:文献评论;基础年医生和顾问人员的反馈;修改后的德尔福小组;并由专家完成内容有效性指标。然后,在2010年,通过开发的25项问卷调查,在苏格兰的三个NHS委员会区域对110名基础课程的第一年和第二年的医生进行了在线横断面调查。结果:该问卷经过验证,并在对问卷进行回应的69位基础年医生中进行了试用。飞行员为学员的态度和经验提供了宝贵的见解。例如,32(48%)认为大多数安全事件是由于他们无能为力而导致的; 31名(43%)承认参与了未正式报告的用药错误。结论:该试点研究成功地迈出了第一步,为重点领域的关键人员,预科医师制定了有效的调查问卷。但是,这些发现引起了人们对学员对报告的经验和态度以及事件未报告频率的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号