...
首页> 外文期刊>Postgraduate Medical Journal >Comparative study of enema retention and preference in ulcerative colitis.
【24h】

Comparative study of enema retention and preference in ulcerative colitis.

机译:溃疡性结肠炎的灌肠保留和偏好的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic enemas are often used to treat active colitis but their retention may be limited because of urgency to defecate. Some preparations may be better retained and tolerated than others because of their physical properties. AIM: To compare patient preference and retention of four therapeutic enemas, including a nicotine enema, in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Twenty four patients with active UC received the four trial enemas-corticosteroid, 5-amino salicylate (5-ASA), and nicotine liquid enemas and a corticosteroid foam, in a randomised order, taking one enema on each of four successive nights. Patients scored them 1 to 4 for ease of administration and retention, degree of abdominal bloating, and for their overall preference. RESULTS: Fifteen patients rated nicotine their overall favourite or second favourite, compared with 14 for corticosteroid foam and 11 for 5-ASA and corticosteroid liquids, but this was not significant (p = 0.302). Overall, there was no significant difference in overnight retention. However, the nicotine enema tended to be less well retained in patients with milder urgency but a higher proportion retained it overnight with more severe urgency (p = 0.031 compared with 5-ASA enema). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in patient preference or overall duration of retention for the four enemas.
机译:背景:治疗性灌肠常被用于治疗活动性结肠炎,但由于排便的紧迫性,其保留可能受到限制。由于某些制剂的物理特性,它们可能比其他制剂更好地保留和耐受。目的:比较溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的患者偏好和包括尼古丁灌肠剂在内的四种治疗性灌肠剂的保留率。方法:二十四名活动性UC患者随机接受四个试验灌肠剂,皮质类固醇,5-氨基水杨酸盐​​(5-ASA),尼古丁液体灌肠剂和皮质类固醇泡沫,连续四个晚上每隔一个晚上灌肠一次。患者在给药和保留的容易程度,腹胀程度以及总体偏好方面得分为1-4。结果:15名患者对尼古丁的总体评价为“最喜欢”或“次要”,而皮质类固醇泡沫为14例,5-ASA和皮质类固醇为11例,但这并不显着(p = 0.302)。总体而言,过夜停留时间没有显着差异。但是,对于尿急程度较轻的患者,尼古丁灌肠剂的保留能力往往较差,但过夜尿毒症的比例更高,尿急程度也更严重(与5-ASA灌肠剂相比,p = 0.031)。结论:四种灌肠的患者喜好或总保留时间无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号