...
首页> 外文期刊>Postgraduate Medical Journal >Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty.
【24h】

Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty.

机译:ERCP程序的客观评估:用于评估技术难度的简单等级量表。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: and objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding endoscopic procedure that varies from a simple diagnostic to a highly complex therapeutic procedure. Simple outcome measures such as success and complication rates do not reflect the competence of the operator or endoscopy unit, as case mix is not taken into account. A grading scale to assess the technical difficulty of ERCP can improve the objectivity of outcome data. METHODS: A I to IV technical difficulty grading scale was constructed and applied prospectively to all ERCPs over a 12 month period at a single centre. The procedures were performed by two senior trainees and two experienced consultants (trainers). The grading scale was validated for construct validity and inter-rater reliability at the end of the study using the chi(2) test and kappa statistics. RESULTS: There were 305 ERCPs in 259 patients over the 12 months study period (males: 112, females: 147, age range 17-97, mean 70.3 years). There was overall success in 244 (80%) procedures with complications in 13 (4%): bleeding in five (1.6%), cholangitis in one (0.3%), pancreatitis in five (1.6%), and perforation in two (0.7%). Success rate was highest for grade I, 49/55 (89%), compared with grade IV procedures, 8/11 (73%). There was a significant linear trend towards a lower success rate from grade I to IV (p=0.021) for trainees, but not for trainers. Complications were low in grade I, II, and III procedures, 12/295(4%), compared with grade IV procedures, 1/11(9%). The inter-rater reliability for the grading scale was good with a substantial agreement between the raters (kappa=0.68, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Success and complications of ERCP by trainees are influenced by the technical difficulty of the procedure. Outcome data incorporating a grading scale can give accurate information when auditing the qualitative outcomes. This can provide a platform for structured objective evaluation.
机译:背景与目的:内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是一项技术要求严格的内窥镜检查程序,从简单的诊断到高度复杂的治疗程序不等。由于未考虑病例混合,因此简单的结局指标(例如成功率和并发症发生率)不能反映操作者或内窥镜部门的能力。评估ERCP的技术难度的等级量表可以提高结果数据的客观性。方法:建立一个I至IV技术难度等级量表,并将其前瞻性地应用于单个中心12个月内的所有ERCP。该程序由两名高级培训生和两名经验丰富的顾问(培训师)执行。在研究结束时,使用chi(2)检验和kappa统计量对等级量表的结构有效性和评定者间的可靠性进行了验证。结果:在12个月的研究期间,共有259例患者中有305例ERCP(男性:112例,女性:147例,年龄范围17-97,平均70.3岁)。 244例手术总体成功(80%),并发症13例(4%):出血5例(1.6%),胆管炎1例(0.3%),胰腺炎5例(1.6%),穿孔2例(0.7%) %)。 I级的成功率最高,为49/55(89%),IV级的成功率最高,为8/11(73%)。对于受训者而言,从I级到IV级的成功率存在显着的线性下降趋势(p = 0.021),但对于培训师却没有。一,二,三级手术的并发症发生率较低,为12/295(4%),而四级手术为1/11(9%)。评分者之间的评分者间信度良好,评分者之间基本一致(kappa = 0.68,p <0.001)。结论:受训人员的ERCP成功和复杂性受手术技术难度的影响。结合定级量表的结果数据可以在审核定性结果时提供准确的信息。这可以提供用于结构化客观评估的平台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号