...
首页> 外文期刊>Plasma Sources Science & Technology >A comparison of 3D particle, fluid and hybrid simulations for negative streamers
【24h】

A comparison of 3D particle, fluid and hybrid simulations for negative streamers

机译:负拖缆的3D粒子,流体和混合模拟的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Modeling individual free electrons can be important in the simulation of discharge streamers. Stochastic fluctuations in the electron density can accelerate the branching of streamers. In negative streamers, energetic electrons can even run away and contribute to processes such as terrestrial gamma-ray and electron flashes. To track energies and locations of single electrons in relevant regions, we have developed a 3D hybrid model that couples a particle model for single electrons in the region of high fields and low electron densities with a fluid model in the rest of the domain. Here we validate our 3D hybrid model on a 3D (super-)particle model for negative streamers without photoionization in overvolted gaps. We show that the extended fluid model approximates the particle and the hybrid model well until stochastic fluctuations become important, while the classical fluid model underestimates velocities and ionization densities. We compare density fluctuations and the onset of branching between the models, and we compare the front velocities with an analytical approximation.
机译:对单个自由电子进行建模在模拟放电拖缆中可能很重要。电子密度的随机波动会加速拖缆的分支。在负射流中,高能电子甚至会逸出并有助于诸如地面伽马射线和电子闪光的过程。为了跟踪相关区域中单个电子的能量和位置,我们开发了3D混合模型,该模型将高场和低电子密度区域中单个电子的粒子模型与该域其余部分中的流体模型耦合。在这里,我们在3D(超)粒子模型上验证了3D混合模型的负拖缆,而在过高的间隙中没有光电离。我们表明,扩展流体模型很好地近似了粒子和混合模型,直到随机波动变得重要为止,而经典流体模型低估了速度和电离密度。我们比较了模型之间的密度波动和分支开始,并用解析近似值比较了前速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号