首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >RSI in pediatric anesthesia - is it used by nonpediatric anesthetists? A survey from south-west England.
【24h】

RSI in pediatric anesthesia - is it used by nonpediatric anesthetists? A survey from south-west England.

机译:儿科麻醉中的RSI-非儿科麻醉师是否使用过RSI?来自英格兰西南部的一项调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is the 'gold standard' technique for preventing aspiration of gastric contents during induction of anesthesia in unfasted patients. We conducted a survey to discover whether the conduct of RSI in children varies amongst anesthetists and if practice alters in relation to the time since training or degree of ongoing experience. Methods: Six hundred and fifteen questionnaires were sent to anesthetists in the south-west of England. Results: The response rate was 61%. Preoxygenation was utilized by 83% of anesthetists for infants whereas 94% preoxygenated schoolchildren, P < 0.001. Only 59% of respondents used cricoid pressure in infants, compared with 96% in schoolchildren, P < 0.001. Propofol was the induction agent of choice for all anesthetists, although thiopentone was used more in infants (35%) than schoolchildren (9%), P < 0.001. Suxamethonium was widely used in all children. All anesthetists intubated patients for pyloromyotomy, 50% using cricoid pressure. RSI was performed by 86% of anesthetists for appendicectomy, with consultants most likely to deviate from a standard RSI. Sixty percent of anesthetists intubated for manipulation of forearm, 72% performing an RSI, 53% intubated for scrotal exploration, but only 42% performed an RSI. Conclusions: Classical RSI is used for children by most anesthetists in south-west England. RSI is modified for infants especially by more recently trained consultants. Suxamethonium is used less by consultant anesthetists. Whilst RSI is performed for appendicectomy there is a large variation in techniques for anesthetizing children for MUA and scrotal exploration which is independent of the grade of anesthetist.
机译:背景:快速序列诱导(RSI)是防止未禁食患者在麻醉诱导过程中胃内容物吸入的“黄金标准”技术。我们进行了一项调查,以了解麻醉师对儿童的RSI行为是否有所不同,以及实践与培训后的时间或持续的经验水平是否有关。方法:向英格兰西南部的麻醉师发送了615份问卷。结果:回应率为61%。婴儿中83%的麻醉师使用了预氧合,而94%的预氧学童使用了预氧合,P <0.001。在婴儿中,只有59%的受访者使用了环压,而在学童中只有96%,P <0.001。丙泊酚是所有麻醉药的首选诱导剂,尽管婴儿(35%)比小学生(9%)使用硫喷妥酮的比例更高(P <0.001)。地塞米隆被广泛用于所有儿童中。所有麻醉师使用环压术向患者插管幽门切开术,其中50%。 RSI由86%的麻醉师进行阑尾切除术,顾问最有可能偏离标准RSI。 60%的麻醉师通过插管进行前臂操作,其中72%进行了RSI,53%进行了阴囊探查,但只有42%进行了RSI。结论:英格兰西南部的大多数麻醉师都将古典RSI用于儿童。 RSI已针对婴儿进行了修改,尤其是由最近受过培训的顾问进行了修改。顾问麻醉师很少使用Suxamethonium。在进行阑尾切除术的RSI手术时,麻醉儿童进行MUA和阴囊探查的技术存在很大差异,与麻醉师的等级无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号