...
首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >Status of pediatric anesthesiology fellowship research education in the United States: A survey of fellowship program directors
【24h】

Status of pediatric anesthesiology fellowship research education in the United States: A survey of fellowship program directors

机译:美国儿科麻醉学研究奖学金的现状:研究计划主任的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Currently, very little information is known regarding the research education of pediatric anesthesia fellows. Objective: The main objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the status of research training in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs in the United States. Methods: Survey responses were solicited from forty-six pediatric anesthesia fellowship directors. Questions evaluated department demographic information, the extent of faculty research activity, research resources and research funding in the department, the characteristics of fellow research education and fellow research productivity, departmental support for fellow research, and perceived barriers to fellow research education. Results: Thirty-six of forty-six fellowship directors responded to the survey, for a response rate of 78%. Eight of fourteen (57%) programs with a structured curriculum had more than 20% of graduating fellows publish a peer-reviewed manuscript compared with only five of twenty-two (23%) programs, which did not have a structured research curriculum (P = 0.03). While the majority of program directors (thirty of thirty-six (83%)) did not think that fellows are adequately trained to pursue research activities, only a minority of program directors (7 of 36 (19%)) thought that an extra year of fellowship dedicated to research should become a requirement. Conclusion: Structured research curriculum is associated with increased research productivity during pediatric anesthesia fellowship. Important barriers to fellows' research education include high clinical demands and lack of research time for faculty. Despite acknowledging the poor research education, a small minority of fellowship directors supports the addition of an extra year exclusively dedicated to research.
机译:背景:目前,关于小儿麻醉研究员的研究教育的信息很少。目的:本研究的主要目的是评估美国儿科麻醉研究金计划中研究培训的状况。方法:向四十六名儿科麻醉研究金主任征求调查答复。这些问题评估了部门的人口统计学信息,部门研究活动的范围,部门中的研究资源和研究经费,同伴研究教育和同伴研究生产力的特征,部门对同伴研究的支持以及对同伴研究教育的感知障碍。结果:46位研究金主任中的36位对调查做出了回应,回应率为78%。具有结构化课程的14个课程中有8个(57%)的毕业生中有20%以上的人发布了同行评审的手稿,而没有结构性研究课程的22个课程(23%)中只有5个没有发布结构化研究课程(P = 0.03)。尽管大多数计划主任(三十六名(83%))认为研究员没有接受过足够的从事研究活动的培训,但只有少数计划主任(36名中的7名(19%))认为这一年多了专门用于研究的研究金应该成为一项要求。结论:结构化研究课程与儿科麻醉研究金期间的研究生产率提高相关。研究员的研究教育的重要障碍包括对临床的高要求和缺乏教师的研究时间。尽管承认研究教育水平很低,但一小部分研究金主任仍支持增加一年专门用于研究的费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号