首页> 外文期刊>Population ecology >Estimation of dispersal distance by mark-recapture experiments using traps: correction of bias caused by the artificial removal by traps
【24h】

Estimation of dispersal distance by mark-recapture experiments using traps: correction of bias caused by the artificial removal by traps

机译:通过使用陷阱的标记夺回实验估算散布距离:校正由陷阱人为去除造成的偏差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although in mark-recapture experiments traps are useful to estimate the dispersal distance of organisms, they cause a dilemma that may be called a kind of Heisenberg effect: a large number of traps should be placed to yield a precise estimate of mean dispersal distance, while these traps shorten the mean dispersal distance itself by intercepting organisms that should have dispersed for further distances. We propose a procedure to solve this dilemma by placing traps uniformly in a lattice pattern, and by assuming a random movement and a constant rate of settlement for organisms. We applied this procedure to estimate the dispersal distance of the sugarcane wireworm Melanotus okinawensis Ohira (Coleoptera: Elateridae). The estimated mean dispersal distance was 143.8 m. Through the use of a conventional method of estimation, the mean dispersal distance was estimated to be 118.1 m. Thus, it was shown that the conventional estimate of dispersal distance was 18% smaller than the corrected estimate in our experiment.
机译:尽管在标记重夺实验中,陷阱可用于估计生物的扩散距离,但它们会引起两难境地,即所谓的海森堡效应:应放置大量陷阱以准确估计平均扩散距离,而这些陷阱通过拦截应该分散更远距离的生物来缩短平均分散距离本身。我们提出了一种程序来解决此难题,方法是将陷阱均匀地放置在格子模式中,并假设生物体具有随机运动和恒定的沉降速率。我们应用此程序估算了甘蔗线虫Melanotus okinawensis Ohira(鞘翅目:Elateridae)的传播距离。估计的平均分散距离为143.8 m。通过使用常规估计方法,平均分散距离估计为118.1 m。因此,表明分散距离的常规估算值比我们实验中的校正估算值小18%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号