首页> 外文期刊>Population and Development Review >The Influence of Informal Work and Subjective Weil-Being on Childbearing in Post-Soviet Russia
【24h】

The Influence of Informal Work and Subjective Weil-Being on Childbearing in Post-Soviet Russia

机译:后苏联时期的非正式工作和主观幸福感对生育的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

THE DECLINE TO very low fertility, defined as a total fertility rate (TFR) below 1.3 births per woman, has been of major concern in recent demographic literature (Kohler, Billari, and Ortega 2002; Caldwell and Schindlmayr 2003; Billari and Kohler 2004; Morgan 2003); fertility rates at these levels lead to negative rates of population growth that are difficult to reverse (Lutz, O'Neill, and Scherbov 2003). The focus of research has primarily been the postponement of first births in Western Europe andthe increase in childlessness (Sobotka 2004; Bongaarts 2002; see also "Conference on postponement of childbearing in Europe" 2005). Little attention has been paid to countries that have achieved very low fertility through the postponement of second and higher-order births while maintaining a relatively early and universal pattern of first births (Perelli-Harris 2005). The questions addressed in these two situations are very different. In societies that have been postponing the entry into parenthood, researchers have examined explanations of uncertainty in young adulthood (Kohler, Billari, and Ortega 2002; Blossfeld 2005) or shifts in values (Surkyn and Lesthaeghe 2004). Yet in lowest-low-fertility societies that are postponing or eliminating second births, the focus should not be on entry into parenthood, which is still relatively young and near-universal, but on why people choose to have or not to have additional children.
机译:极低的生育率(定义为每名妇女的总生育率低于1.3个生育率)的下降,在最近的人口统计学文献中引起了人们的极大关注(Kohler,Billari和Ortega 2002; Caldwell和Schindlmayr 2003; Billari和Kohler 2004; 2003)。摩根(2003);在这些水平上的生育率导致人口增长率的负增长,很难逆转(Lutz,O'Neill和Scherbov,2003年)。研究的重点主要是西欧推迟生育和无子女现象的增加(Sobotka 2004; Bongaarts 2002;另见“欧洲推迟生育问题会议” 2005)。很少有人关注那些由于推迟二胎和高阶胎而生育率很低的国家,同时又保持了相对较早和普遍的初胎模式(Perelli-Harris 2005)。在这两种情况下解决的问题非常不同。在一直推迟进入父母身份的社会中,研究人员研究了关于年轻成年期不确定性(Kohler,Billari和Ortega 2002; Blossfeld 2005)或价值观转变(Surkyn和Lesthaeghe 2004)的解释。然而,在推迟或消除第二胎的最低生育率的低社会中,重点不应不放在父母上,后者仍然相对年轻且几乎普及,而应着眼于人们为什么选择生或不生额外的孩子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号