首页> 外文期刊>Chemical research in toxicology >Comparative identification of prostanoid inducible proteins by LC-ESI-MS/MS and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
【24h】

Comparative identification of prostanoid inducible proteins by LC-ESI-MS/MS and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

机译:通过LC-ESI-MS / MS和MALDI-TOF质谱比较鉴定前列腺素可诱导蛋白。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Protein identification by MS is well-established. Mixtures of proteins from cell extracts are separated by either one- or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and specific bands or spots are subjected to in-gel digestion and subsequent analysis by MS. The two most common types of ionization used in MS are electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI). When ESI is used, the sample is typically analyzed by inline HPLC-ESI-MS/MS with fragmentation of individual digest peptides, followed by database comparison between theoretical and experimental fragmentation patterns. MALDI-MS analysis is based on peptide mass mapping, with mass measurements of the digest peptides searched against a database of theoretical digests. We give here the results of a comparison between ESI-ion trap and MALDI-TOF (time-of-flight) analysis of 11-deoxy,16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E(2) (DDM-PGE(2)) inducible proteins. Individual peptides identified by the two techniques differed, in general, but the resulting protein identification was the same. Slightly higher coverage of each protein was obtained by MALDI-TOF, but the MS/MS data were more definitive by requiring fewer peptides to assign a positive identification. Both methods effectively identified two proteins in the same gel band. The samples here are derived from a renal epithelial cell line (LLC-PK(1)) established from the New Hampshire minipig, a species poorly represented in the current database, and strategies and limitations for analyzing such species are discussed.
机译:通过MS进行蛋白质鉴定是公认的。来自细胞提取物的蛋白质混合物通过一维或二维凝胶电泳进行分离,并对特定的条带或斑点进行凝胶内消化,然后通过MS进行分析。 MS中使用的两种最常见的电离类型是电喷雾电离(ESI)和基质辅助激光解吸/电离(MALDI)。当使用ESI时,通常通过在线HPLC-ESI-MS / MS对样品进行分析,并对单个消化肽进行片段化,然后在理论和实验片段化模式之间进行数据库比较。 MALDI-MS分析基于肽质量图,可根据理论消化物数据库搜索消化肽的质量测量值。我们在这里给出ESI离子阱和MALDI-TOF(飞行时间)分析11-脱氧,16,16-二甲基前列腺素E(2)(DDM-PGE(2))诱导蛋白的比较结果。通常,通过两种技术鉴定的单个肽有所不同,但是所得的蛋白质鉴定是相同的。 MALDI-TOF可以使每种蛋白质的覆盖率略高,但是MS / MS数据更具确定性,因为它需要较少的肽来分配阳性鉴定物。两种方法都有效地鉴定了同一条凝胶带中的两种蛋白质。这里的样本来自从新罕布什尔小型猪建立的肾上皮细胞系(LLC-PK(1)),该种在当前数据库中的代表性不高,并讨论了分析此类的策略和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号