...
首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers
【24h】

Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers

机译:日粮益生菌和高放养密度对肉鸡生产性能,car体产量,肠道菌群和应激指标的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A study was carried out to evaluate the effect of dietary probiotic supplementation and stocking density on the performance, relative carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress markers of broilers. One-day-old Ross 308 male broiler chickens (n = 480) were allocated to 4 experimental groups for 42 d. Each treatment had 8 replicates of 15 chicks each. Two groups were subjected to a high stocking density (HSD) of 20 birds/m(2) and the other 2 groups were kept at low stocking density (LSD) of 10 birds/m(2). A basal diet supplemented with probiotic 1 and 0.5 g/kg of diet (in starter and finisher diets, respectively) was fed to 2 treatments, one with HSD and the other with LSD, thereby making a 2x2 factorial arrangement. There was no interaction between stocking density (LSD and HSD) and dietary probiotic (supplemented and unsupplemented) for all the variables. Feed intake and weight gain were significantly low and feed conversion ratio was poor in broilers at HSD. Dietary probiotic significantly enhanced the feed intake and weight gain in starter phase only. Dietary probiotic supplementation had no effect (P > 0.05) on total aerobs, Salmonella sp., and Lactobacilli populations in the intestines of broilers. However, HSD reduced the Lactobacilli population only (P 0.05). Relative breast yields were significantly higher in broilers reared at LSD than HSD. Thigh meat yield was higher in broilers in HSD group compared to LSD. Dietary probiotic did not affect the relative carcass yield and weight of lymphoid organs. Serum malondialdehyde, corticosterone, nitric oxide, and plasma heterophil: lymphocyte ratio were not affected either by stocking density or dietary probiotic supplementation. In conclusion, HSD negatively affected the performance and intestinal Lactobacilli population of broilers only, whereas probiotic supplementation enhanced the performance of broilers during the starter phase only. Total aerobes, Salmonella, Lactobacilli carcass yield, and stress indicators of broilers were not affected by the dietary supplementation of probiotic under the conditions of the present study.
机译:进行了一项研究,以评估饮食中益生菌的补充和放养密度对肉鸡生产性能,相对car体产量,肠道菌群和应激指标的影响。将一天大的Ross 308雄性肉鸡(n = 480)分配给4个实验组,持续42天。每种处理均重复8次,每组15只小鸡。两组分别接受20只鸡/ m(2)的高放养密度(HSD),其他两组保持10只鸟/ m(2)的低放养密度(LSD)。将补充了益生菌1和0.5 g / kg饮食的基础饮食(分别在开始和结束饮食中)饲喂2种处理,一种采用HSD,另一种采用LSD,从而进行2x2析因排列。在所有变量中,放养密度(LSD和HSD)与膳食益生菌(补充和未补充)之间没有相互作用。在HSD时,肉鸡的采食量和增重明显较低,而饲料转化率则很差。膳食益生菌仅在开始阶段就显着提高了采食量和体重增加。膳食益生菌补充剂对肉鸡肠道中的总需氧菌,沙门氏菌和乳酸菌种群没有影响(P> 0.05)。但是,HSD仅减少了乳酸杆菌种群(P <0.05)。在LSD下饲养的肉鸡的相对乳房产量显着高于HSD。与LSD相比,HSD组肉鸡的大腿肉产量更高。膳食益生菌不影响相对car体产量和淋巴器官重量。血清丙二醛,皮质酮,一氧化氮和血浆异源性:淋巴细胞的比例不受放养密度或膳食益生菌补充的影响。总之,HSD仅对肉鸡的生产性能和肠道乳杆菌数量产生负面影响,而益生菌补充剂仅在雏鸡阶段提高了肉鸡的生产性能。在本研究条件下,益生菌膳食补充剂不影响总需氧量,沙门氏菌,car体乳酸菌产量和肉鸡应激指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号