首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Environmental assessment of three egg production systems-Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality
【24h】

Environmental assessment of three egg production systems-Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality

机译:三种蛋生产系统的环境评估-第一部分:监控系统和室内空气质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To comprehensively assess conventional vs. some alternative laying-hen housing systems under U.S. production conditions, a multi-institute and multi-disciplinary project, known as the Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply (CSES) study, was carried out at a commercial egg production farm in the Midwestern United States over two single-cycle production flocks. The housing systems studied include a conventional cage house (200,000 hen capacity), an aviary house (50,000 hen capacity), and an enriched colony house (50,000 hen capacity). As an integral part of the CSES project, continual environmental monitoring over a 27-month period described in this paper quantifies indoor gaseous and particulate matter concentrations, thermal environment, and building ventilation rate of each house. Results showed that similar indoor thermal environments in all three houses were maintained through ventilation management and environmental control. Gaseous and particulate matter concentrations of the enriched colony house were comparable with those of the conventional cage house. In comparison, the aviary house had poorer indoor air quality, especially in wintertime, resulting from the presence of floor litter (higher ammonia levels) and hens' ac-tivities (higher particulate matter levels) in it. Specifically, daily mean indoor ammonia concentrations had the 95% confidence interval values of 3.8 to 4.2 (overall mean of 4.0) ppm for the conventional cage house; 6.2 to 7.2 (overall mean of 6.7) ppm for the aviary house; and 2.7 to 3.0 (overall mean of 2.8) ppm for the enriched colony house. The 95% confidence interval (overall mean) values of daily mean indoor carbon dioxide concentrations were 1997 to 2170 (2083) ppm for the conventional cage house, 2367 to 2582 (2475) ppm for the aviary house, and 2124 to 2309 (2216) ppm for the enriched colony house. Daily mean indoor methane concentrations were similar for all three houses, with 95% confidence interval values of 11.1 to 11.9 (overall mean of 11.5) ppm. The 95% confidence interval values (overall mean) of daily mean PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, in mg/m(3), were, respectively, 0.57 to 0.61 (0.59) and 0.033 to 0.037 (0.035) for the conventional cage house, 3.61 to 4.29 (3.95) and 0.374 to 0.446 (0.410) for the aviary house, and 0.42 to 0.46 (0.44) and 0.054 to 0.059 (0.056) for the enriched colony house. Investigation of mitigation practices to improve indoor air quality of the litter-floor aviary housing system is warranted.
机译:为了在美国生产条件下全面评估常规蛋鸡舍和其他蛋鸡舍系统,在一个商业蛋生产场进行了一个多机构,多学科的项目,称为可持续鸡蛋供应联盟(CSES)研究。在美国中西部的两个单周期生产群中。研究的住房系统包括常规的笼舍(200,000鸡只的容量),鸟舍(50,000鸡只的容量)和丰富的殖民地鸡舍(50,000只的容量)。作为CSES项目不可或缺的一部分,本文所述的持续27个月的环境监测可以量化每个房屋的室内气体和颗粒物浓度,热环境和建筑物通风率。结果表明,通过通风管理和环境控制,在所有三个房屋中都保持了相似的室内热环境。富集殖民地房屋的气态和颗粒物浓度与常规笼屋相当。相比之下,鸟舍的室内空气质量较差,尤其是在冬季,这是由于地板垫料(较高的氨含量)和母鸡的活动(较高的颗粒物含量)导致的。具体而言,对于常规笼屋,日平均室内氨浓度的95%置信区间值为3.8至4.2(总平均值为4.0)ppm。禽舍的6.2至7.2(总平均值为6.7)ppm;富集殖民地房屋为2.7至3.0(总平均值为2.8)ppm。传统笼屋的室内平均二氧化碳浓度的95%置信区间(总体平均值)值为1997至2170(2083)ppm,鸟笼为2367至2582(2475)ppm,以及2124至2309(2216)富集殖民地房屋的ppm。这三座房屋的每日平均室内甲烷浓度均相似,95%置信区间值为11.1至11.9 ppm(总平均值为11.5)ppm。传统笼舍的每日平均PM10和PM2.5浓度的95%置信区间值(总体平均值),以mg / m(3)计分别为0.57至0.61(0.59)和0.033至0.037(0.035) ,对于禽舍而言为3.61至4.29(3.95)和0.374至0.446(0.410),对于富集殖民地房屋为0.42至0.46(0.44)和0.054至0.059(0.056)。有必要对缓解措施进行研究,以改善垃圾地板鸟舍系统的室内空气质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号