首页> 外文期刊>Poultry International >Feather pecking and dietary protein
【24h】

Feather pecking and dietary protein

机译:羽毛啄和饮食蛋白

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens remain a serious welfare and economic problem in tile egg industry. Pecking damage occurs as unpredictable outbreaks, particularly in non-cage systems. Its consequences can range from minimal feather damage to serious feather loss, injury anti mortality. Despite numerous investigations, the causation of this damaging behaviour is not fully understood, although factors such as lighting, stocking density, group size, rearing environment and genetic predisposition have all been implicated. In recent years, it has been suggested that increasing levels of pecking damage might be causally related to the increased reliance on plant protein sources for layer diets. This has been due to restrictions imposed by some retailers, the relatively high cost of fishmeal, and the recent ban on the use of meat and bone meal. Anecdotal reports from egg producers have suggested that inclusion of animal protein (in particular fishmeal) Can be effective in preventing or halting outbreaks of damaging pecking once they have begun. The, notion that animal protein could be beneficial was expressed by the UK Farm Animal Welfare Council in its 1997 Report on the welfare of Laying Hens, where they suggested that "lack of animal protein in the diet predisposes tile flock to injurious pecking leading to cannibalism and death". They recommended "further research work to identify and quantify the factors in animal protein responsible for reducing injurious behaviour in laying hens". However, there is currently no experimental evidence demonstrating a beneficial effect of animal protein on pecking damage, and the alternative possibility of a detrimental effect of plant protein sources has been ignored. Soya bean meal, for example, is a rich source phytoestrogens, and it is conceivable that these biologically active compounds could have an effect on behaviour. To address these questions, at study was carried out at Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), to investigate experimentally whether dietary protein source (animal or plant) had any effect on tile development of feather pecking and cannibalism in layer pullets.
机译:蛋鸡啄羽和自相残杀仍然是瓷砖鸡蛋行业中严重的福利和经济问题。啄伤是由于无法预测的爆发而发生的,尤其是在非笼式系统中。其后果可能范围从最小的羽毛损坏到严重的羽毛丢失,伤害和死亡。尽管进行了许多研究,但是尽管已经暗示了诸如照明,种群密度,种群规模,饲养环境和遗传易感性等因素,但尚未完全了解这种破坏行为的原因。近年来,有人提出啄食的啄食损害可能与增加的啄食性损害有因果关系。这是由于一些零售商施加的限制,鱼粉的相对较高的价格以及最近禁止使用肉和骨粉的原因。鸡蛋生产者的轶事报告表明,一旦包含动物蛋白(尤其是鱼粉),就可以有效地防止或阻止破坏性啄食的爆发。英国农场动物福利委员会在其关于蛋鸡福利的1997年报告中表达了动物蛋白可能有益的观点,他们提出“饮食中缺乏动物蛋白会导致成群的鸡群啄食,导致自相残杀。和死亡”。他们建议“开展进一步的研究工作,以鉴定和量化动物蛋白中减少蛋鸡伤害行为的因素”。然而,目前尚无实验证据证明动物蛋白对啄食性损伤具有有益作用,而对植物蛋白来源产生有害作用的另一种可能性已被忽略。例如,大豆粉是一种丰富的植物雌激素来源,可以想象这些生物活性化合物可能对行为产生影响。为了解决这些问题,罗斯林研究所(爱丁堡)进行了一项研究,以实验方式调查饮食中的蛋白质来源(动物或植物)是否对鸡群的啄羽和同类相食产生了影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号