首页> 外文期刊>Social cognitive and affective neuroscience >Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences
【24h】

Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences

机译:自发性和故意特质推断的不一致

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study explores the fMRI correlates of observers making trait inferences about other people under conflicting social cues. Participants were presented with several behavioral descriptions involving an agent that implied a particular trait. The last behavior was either consistent or inconsistent with the previously implied trait. This was done under instructions that elicited either spontaneous trait inferences ('read carefully') or intentional trait inferences ('infer a trait'). The results revealed that when the behavioral descriptions violated earlier trait implications, regardless of instruction, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was more strongly recruited as well as the domain-general conflict network including the posterior medial frontal cortex (pmFC) and the right prefrontal cortex (rPFC). These latter two areas were more strongly activated under intentional than spontaneous instructions. These findings suggest that when trait-relevant behavioral information is inconsistent, not only is activity increased in the mentalizing network responsible for trait processing, but control is also passed to a higher level conflict monitoring network in order to detect and resolve the contradiction.
机译:这项研究探索了在冲突的社会暗示下观察者做出关于其他人的特质推断的观察者的fMRI相关性。为参与者提供了一些行为暗示,其中涉及暗示特定特征的主体。最后的行为与先前暗示的特征一致或不一致。这是根据引起自发特质推断(“仔细阅读”)或有意特质推断(“推断特质”)的指令完成的。结果表明,当行为描述违反了较早的特质暗示时,无论采用何种指导,内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)的招募力都更大,包括后内侧额叶皮层(pmFC)和右侧前额叶的领域-一般冲突网络皮质(rPFC)。后两个区域在有意指示下比在自发指示下更强烈地被激活。这些发现表明,当与特质相关的行为信息不一致时,不仅负责特质处理的心理网络中的活动增加,而且控制权也传递给更高级别的冲突监视网络以检测和解决矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号