首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy theory and practice >A validity and reliability study of the Turkish Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) questionnaire in musculoskeletal physical therapy patients
【24h】

A validity and reliability study of the Turkish Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) questionnaire in musculoskeletal physical therapy patients

机译:土耳其核对清单个人力量(CIS)问卷在肌肉骨骼物理治疗患者中的有效性和可靠性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and purpose The aims of this study were the following: (1) to develop a Turkish version of the Checklist Individual Strength Questionnaire (CIS-T); (2) to evaluate the reliability and validity of the CIS-T; and (3) to compare the fatigue levels between musculoskeletal physical therapy patients and healthy subjects. Methods: The questionnaire was adapted to Turkish using a 'back translation' method. Fifty healthy subjects and 165 musculoskeletal physical therapy patients (128 outpatients and 37 inpatients) were evaluated. To validate the CIS-T, all participants answered both the CIS-T and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). The CIS was re-administered one week later for testretest reliability. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the CIS-T was Cronbach's α0.87 and the interclass correlation coefficient reliability was r0.92. The item-discriminant validity ranged from r0.10 to 0.63. The correlations between the total scores of the scale and the subscale scores of the SF-36 were significant and negative (p<0.01). The total CIS scores were significantly higher in musculoskeletal physical therapy patients (inpatients) than in healthy subjects, but there was no significant difference between musculoskeletal physical therapy patients (outpatients) and healthy subjects (p<0.05). Conclusion: The CIS-T was a valid and reliable scale for assessing fatigue in physical therapy patients and the fatigue levels of musculoskeletal physical therapy patients were higher than those of healthy subjects.
机译:背景和目的本研究的目的如下:(1)编写土耳其语版的个人能力调查表(CIS-T); (2)评估CIS-T的可靠性和有效性; (3)比较肌肉骨骼理疗患者和健康受试者的疲劳水平。方法:使用“反向翻译”方法将问卷调查表改编为土耳其语。评价了五十名健康受试者和165名肌肉骨骼物理治疗患者(128名门诊患者和37名住院患者)。为了验证CIS-T,所有参与者都回答了CIS-T和Short-36(SF-36)。一周后重新测试CIS,以提高测试的可靠性。结果:CIS-T内部一致性信度为Cronbach'sα0.87,组间相关系数信度为r0.92。区分项目的有效性范围从r0.10到0.63。量表总分与SF-36子量表分之间的相关性为显着和负相关(p <0.01)。肌肉骨骼物理治疗患者(住院患者)的总CIS得分显着高于健康受试者,但肌肉骨骼物理治疗患者(门诊患者)与健康受试者之间无显着差异(p <0.05)。结论:CIS-T是评估理疗患者疲劳的有效且可靠的量表,肌肉骨骼理疗患者的疲劳水平高于健康受试者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号