...
首页> 外文期刊>Point of care >Cost Comparison for Glucose Testing by Point-of-Care Glucose Meter Compared With a Standard Laboratory Clinical Chemistry Analyzer: A Patient's Perspective From the Country of Thailand
【24h】

Cost Comparison for Glucose Testing by Point-of-Care Glucose Meter Compared With a Standard Laboratory Clinical Chemistry Analyzer: A Patient's Perspective From the Country of Thailand

机译:通过现场血糖仪与标准实验室临床化学分析仪比较进行葡萄糖测试的成本比较:泰国国家/地区患者的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Monitoring of blood glucose levels is standard of care for the management of diabetes mellitus. To determine glucose levels, various clinical chemistry techniques can be used. Patient self-monitoring using handheld capillary blood glucose monitors is commonly practiced throughout the world and has permitted improved outcomes for diabetic patients by facilitating achievement of tight glycemic control. However, these devices and the reagent strips can be expensive particularly for poor patients without medical insurance. In less well-developed countries with large populations of people in poverty, the cost issues are especially significant. Furthermore, cost issues may significantly limit the frequency of testing compared with what might be considered optimal for diabetic management. Here, the author performs a cost analysis study to compare the determination of glucose by point-of-care glucose meter versus a laboratory clinical chemistry analyzer from the perspective of the patient. According to this study, for a patient in Thailand, the cost per test for the glucose meter is more expensive than the laboratory test if the number of tests performed is less than 78 tests. If the patient purchases the point-of-care meter, it will take about 6.5 years of use to reach the break-even point (if the blood glucose testing is recommended as a monthly follow-up). Therefore, the point-of-care meter is not a good alternative for short-term use, based on medical economics existing in Thailand. Glucose monitoring using a point-of-care device can be economically justified for both long-term monthly follow-up and for frequent home monitoring of diabetic patients.
机译:监测血糖水平是控制糖尿病的护理标准。为了确定葡萄糖水平,可以使用各种临床化学技术。使用手持式毛细管血糖监测器进行患者自我监测在世界范围内很普遍,并且通过促进严格的血糖控制已使糖尿病患者的预后得到改善。但是,这些设备和试剂条可能很昂贵,特别是对于没有医疗保险的贫困患者。在贫穷人口众多的欠发达国家中,成本问题尤为重要。此外,与糖尿病管理的最佳选择相比,成本问题可能会大大限制测试的频率。在这里,作者进行了一项成本分析研究,从患者的角度比较了即时血糖仪和实验室临床化学分析仪对葡萄糖的测定结果。根据这项研究,对于泰国的患者,如果执行的测试次数少于78次,则血糖仪的每次测试成本将比实验室测试昂贵。如果患者购买了即时护理仪,则达到收支平衡点将需要大约6.5年的使用时间(如果建议每月进行血糖检查)。因此,根据泰国现有的医学经济学,即时护理仪不是短期使用的好选择。对于长期每月一次的随访以及对糖尿病患者的频繁家庭监护,使用现场护理设备进行葡萄糖监测在经济上是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号