首页> 外文期刊>Poiesis & praxis >Health technology assessment between our health care system and our health Exploring the potential of reflexive HTA
【24h】

Health technology assessment between our health care system and our health Exploring the potential of reflexive HTA

机译:我们的医疗体系与健康之间的健康技术评估探索自反性HTA的潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this contribution, I wish to explore the potential of health technology assessment and ethics for increasing our capacity to pre-empt the shortcomings and undesired consequences of modern health care while maintaining its benefits. Central is the presumption that in case of some health problems this cannot be done unless we explicitly reconsider some features of the modern health care system, especially those related to its strong reliance on scientific rationality and the strong role played by medical professionals. So as to both maintain the benefits of advanced health care and ensure that it produces less reason for concern, we need to reconsider our approach to rationality- and maybe even the way in which we build our health care system around that rationality. That is, we need to introduce an element of reflexivity. Two types of circumstances are being explored in which such reflexivity may prove worthwhile: controversies on side effects, and persistent problems encountered in optimising health care. Drawing on brief discussions of typical cases, we explore the potential of reflexive HTA and its methodical prerequisites. We conclude that ethicists may contribute to reflexive HTA, if they combine a hermeneutic-and often also participative-methodology with a solid understanding of the relation between the health problem under scrutiny and more general critique of the health care system. Insights from the areas of science and technology studies, as well as from social philosophy may be critical items in their tool kit.
机译:在此贡献中,我希望探索卫生技术评估和道德操守在增强我们预防现代医疗保健的缺点和不良后果同时保持其益处的能力方面的潜力。中心假设是,除非我们明确重新考虑现代医疗体系的某些功能,特别是与它强烈依赖科学合理性和医疗专业人员的强大作用有关的那些功能,否则在某些健康问题下无法做到这一点。为了既保持高级医疗保健的好处,又确保减少引起关注的原因,我们需要重新考虑合理性的方法,甚至可能要考虑围绕这种合理性构建医疗保健体系的方式。也就是说,我们需要引入自反性元素。正在研究两种情况,在这种情况下,这种反射性可能值得证明:关于副作用的争议,以及在优化医疗保健方面遇到的持续性问题。通过对典型案例的简短讨论,我们探索了反思性HTA的潜力及其系统的前提条件。我们得出的结论是,如果伦理学家将诠释学方法学(通常也包括参与性方法学)与经过仔细研究的健康问题与更广泛的医疗保健批评之间的关系相结合,则可能有助于自反性HTA。科学技术研究领域以及社会哲学领域的见解可能是其工具包中的关键项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号